From: super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.liberalism, alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican, can.politics
Subject: Re: If Injuns Weren't Included How Were Hispanics Who Weren't Even a PART of America?
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2025 22:03:24 -0600
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2025-02-16 03:13:04 +0000, pothead said:
> On 2025-02-16, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>> On 2025-02-15 18:40, pothead wrote:
>>> On 2025-02-16, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>> On 2025-02-15 17:14, pothead wrote:
>>>>> On 2025-02-16, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 2025-02-15 15:13, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, 14 Feb 2025 17:52:42 -0800, Alan says...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2025-02-14 17:35, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 13 Feb 2025 21:55:47 -0800, Alan says...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-02-13 20:59, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 13 Feb 2025 20:03:18 -0800, Alan says...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not one author was thinking about babies born to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> illegals.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Because at the time there WERE no illegals...
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> https://i.imgur.com/MePjbdp.mp4
>>>>>>>>>> Question 1: Was the person born in the US?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Question 2: Was the person "subject to the
>>>>>>>>>> jurisdiction" of the US?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> If the answer to both is "Yes":
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> US citizen.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Period.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Nope.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> =====
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> How many times have amendments been changed?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The Constitution has been amended 27 times, most
>>>>>>>>> recently in 1992.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Irrelevant.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Nope.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It is the law of the land UNTIL it is changed.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No... "it" is NOT the "law of the land", if they can
>>>>>>> convince judges that it never applied to illegal alien's
>>>>>>> babies. They won't even have to change the wording.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "The 14th Amendment applied to ex-slaves." - USSC
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Bye, Mexicans.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Tough titty Democrats... you don't get to use Mexicans to
>>>>>>> bolster your voter roles, no mo.
>>>>>> That will be hard even for the right's bought-and-paid-for
>>>>>> justices to do...
>>>>>
>>>>> ROTFLMAO! Yea, I can see all of those right bought justices
>>>>> trying to stop Trump's EO right now. Darn you are stupid Alan.
>>>>
>>>> Please... ...you know I was replying to the "USSC.
>>>
>>> SCOTUS is determined by what party is in power when justices need to
>>> be replace due to death or retiring. Just because the timing doesn't
>>> give your side the advantage is no reason to whine. That's the
>>> system we have. Deal with it.
>>>
>>
>> Except when the Republicans block the nominee because it's "too close to
>> an election"...
>>
>> ...and then confirm a nominee just a couple of WEEKs before an election.
>
> Both sides do it.
> <https://thefederalist.com/2016/02/16/10-times-democrats-vowed-to-block-republican-nominees/>
>
> That's the way the system works.
> Deal with it.
The fact is you did a 180 degree turnaround from your own "rule" to
have the 6-3 majority you have now. Ruthless power-grabbing hypocrites.
Five of these were appointed by a Republican president who didn't
receive a majority of votes from the American people, BTW.