From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: rec.travel.air,talk.politics.guns,can.politics,sac.politics
Subject: Re: Can't Blame Trump! All 80 aboard Delta flight survive after jet
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 11:32:16 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2025-02-19 10:03, tye syding wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 22:02:14 -0800
> Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2025-02-18 15:24, tye syding wrote:
>>> On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 15:02:23 -0800
>>> Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2025-02-18 13:38, tye syding wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 13:20:42 -0800
>>>>> Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2025-02-18 12:14, tye syding wrote:
>>>>>>> On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 08:58:34 -0800
>>>>>>> Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> you can't determine blame simply by looking at where an
>>>>>>>> accident happened
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Of course you can where intense meterological conditions exist,
>>>>>>> especially snowy runways, crosswinds and sudden downdrafts.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> No. That isn't about "where" it happened.
>>>>>
>>>>> You've lost all your marbles, snow mexican.
>>>>>
>>>>> Weather is intensely place-correlated.
>>>> Sure... ...but "correlation is not causation".
>>>
>>> Bad weather was caused by location and atmospheric dynamics.
>>>
>>>> Bottom line:
>>>>
>>>> We don't know why this jet crashed.
>>>
>>> Yet.
>>>
>>> But we can see that video and the right wing catch and know that
>>> slippery conditions and high crosswinds played a role.
>>>
>>> The NTSB workup will in time explain if the landing gear collapsed
>>> or there were other factors.
>>>
>>> For now - weather.
>> Actually, what was obvious that you've utterly failed to see is that
>> the descent rate was FAR TOO HIGH.
>
> That came out this morning.
>
> Could be a microburst, or flaps malfunction, there are no black box
> reading yet, are there?
>
> Funny thing, as easily as it was to recover.
>
Ah, yes!
The conspiracy theorist emerges!