From: Bi-valve Mollusk <Bi-valve_Mollusk@riptear.com>
Newsgroups: alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics
Subject: Re: Proof Liberals Have ZERO Sense of Humour
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 15:58:29 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2/20/2025 3:42 PM, Alan wrote:
> On 2025-02-20 12:16, Bi-valve Mollusk wrote:
>> On 2/20/2025 2:23 PM, Alan wrote:
>>> On 2025-02-20 11:18, Bi-valve Mollusk wrote:
>>>> On 2/20/2025 12:44 PM, Alan wrote:
>>>>> On 2025-02-20 05:28, Bi-valve Mollusk wrote:
>>>>>> On 2/19/2025 5:42 PM, Alan wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2025-02-19 13:20, Bi-valve Mollusk wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2/19/2025 3:01 PM, Alan wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 2025-02-19 11:45, Bi-valve Mollusk wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 2/19/2025 2:28 PM, Alan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-02-19 10:02, Bi-valve Mollusk wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/19/2025 12:32 PM, Alan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-02-18 15:13, tye syding wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 15:00:37 -0800 Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-02-18 13:53, Bi-valve Mollusk wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2/18/2025 4:30 PM, Alan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-02-18 13:25, tye syding wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 11:35:56 -0800 Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Let's balance the budget! DOGE's total estimated
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> savings
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are $55 billion, which is...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...a far cry from the $2 TRILLION Musk said they could
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> find.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The forensic examination has only just begun, dipshit.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is literally no evidence presented that there has
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> been
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> any "examination" done of any kind.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yet the left keeps going to court to prevent
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> examinations of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> non- examinations.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cite such a case...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You just love to have your ass handed to you, doncha
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> canucklehead?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/federal-judge-blocks-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> elon- musks-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doge-from-accessing-treasury-records-after-democratic-ags-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> file-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> lawsuit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Federal judge blocks Elon Musk's DOGE from accessing Treasury
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> records after Democratic AGs file lawsuit Elon Musk called
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> judge's decision 'absolutely insane'
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry, but that is not an example of "the left" doing
>>>>>>>>>>>>> anything.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> That is a judge applying the law.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Of course it is. This is a case(s) of the left filing a
>>>>>>>>>>>> number of lawsuits in front of left-leaning judges.
>>>>>>>>>>> So any decision you disagree with must be from bias?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Nah, but so far the cases that have been brought are from the
>>>>>>>>>> left, in front of left leaning judges. Coincidence?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You don't get to choose which judge you get, doofus.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Actualy, you do.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Really?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Show me something that says that's true.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here you go.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://news.bloomberglaw.com/ip-law/battle-against-trump-doge-
>>>>>> overhaul- to-play-out-in-select-courts
>>>>>
>>>>> Sorry, but there is a difference between picking a VENUE and
>>>>> actually picking a judge.
>>>>
>>>> No, there isn't. Different venues, different judges.
>>>
>>> Except each venue has MORE THAN ONE judge, doofus.
>>
>> No shit, sherlock. You continue to make my case for me and don't even
>> realize it.
> Nope.
>
> My point is that you don't get to pick which judge you get...
You do by forum shopping. I already posted the link discussing it. Case
closed.
>
> ...and let's put the back the bit you snipped:
>>>>> And for the record, Trump-appointed judges are ruling against him too.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Oh, look: no response!
>
> You acknowledge this is factual, right?
I never denied it, LOL!!