From: Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: Both Presidents Obama And Biden Said They Wanted To End Waste In Government, So Why Are All You Faggots Whining About DoGE?
Organization: Easynews - www.easynews.com
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2025 22:36:20 -0500
On Sat, 22 Feb 2025 15:17:52 -0700, Mercy-a-lago <run@no.spam> wrote:
>On Sat, 22 Feb 2025 13:38:02 -0800
>Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2025-02-22 13:03, pothead wrote:
>> > On 2025-02-22, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>> >> On 2025-02-22 12:38, Mercy-a-lago wrote:
>> >>> On Sat, 22 Feb 2025 12:32:00 -0800 Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> On 2025-02-22 09:15, tye syding wrote:
>> >>>>> On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 19:02:55 -0800 Siri Cruise
>> >>>>> <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> Musk's political hit squad. He declares as waste his political
>> >>>>>> enemies. He lies and declares waste which you cretins
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Stupid meth whore.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> https://www.foxnews.com/politics/doge-takes-chainsaw-federal-
>> >>>>> spending-7-major-victories-week-got-done
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> DOGE finds a nearly untraceable budget line item responsible for
>> >>>>> $4.7T in payments Earlier this week, DOGE announced it had
>> >>>>> discovered an identification code linking U.S. Treasury payments
>> >>>>> to a budget line item, which accounts for nearly $4.7 trillion
>> >>>>> in payments, that was oftentimes left blank.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> "The Treasury Access Symbol (TAS) is an identification code
>> >>>>> linking a Treasury payment to a budget line item (standard
>> >>>>> financial process)," DOGE wrote in a post on X.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> "In the Federal Government, the TAS field was optional for ~$4.7
>> >>>>> Trillion in payments and was often left blank, making
>> >>>>> traceability almost impossible. As of Saturday, this is now a
>> >>>>> required field, increasing insight into where money is actually
>> >>>>> going."
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> The agency thanked the U.S. Treasury for its work in identifying
>> >>>>> the optional field.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> According to the Bureau of the Fiscal Service, which is under
>> >>>>> the Treasury, TAS codes are used to describe any one of the
>> >>>>> account identification codes assigned by the Treasury and are
>> >>>>> also referred to as the "account."
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> "$4.7 Trillion" so scary.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> My question:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Over what period of time?
>> >>>
>> >>> What part of _almost impossible tracing_ got past you?
>> >>>
>> >>> https://nypost.com/2025/02/17/us-news/doge-discovers-4-7-trillion-in-
>> >>> treasury-payments-were-missing-critical-code/
>> >>>
>> >>> The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) announced Monday
>> >>> that some $4.7 trillion in payments from the Treasury Department
>> >>> were missing a critical tracking code, which made tracing the
>> >>> transactions almost impossible.
>> >> What part of "over what period of time" confused you?
>> >>
>> >> There are obviously individual records of expenditures.
>> >>
>> >> Those records allegedly lack a particular code.
>> >>
>> >> Does that mean they aren't dated?
>> >
>> > It means they are difficult if not impossible to track/trace.
>> As to their PURPOSE, perhaps (assuming we're getting all the facts.
>>
>> But obviously, there is an amount being claimed for each of the
>> records found.
>>
>> And those records almost certainly have dates, so I ask again:
>>
>> Over what time period?
>
>Do you ever relent to reality?
>
>"The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) announced Monday
>that some $4.7 trillion in payments from the Treasury Department
>were missing a critical tracking code, which made tracing the
>transactions almost impossible.
To repeat: Over what time period? Last month? Last year? Last century?