Davin News Server

On 2025-02-23 13:28, Mercy-a-lago wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Feb 2025 12:08:56 -0800
> Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 2025-02-23 11:26, Mercy-a-lago wrote:
>>> On Sat, 22 Feb 2025 22:36:20 -0500
>>> Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>    
>>>> On Sat, 22 Feb 2025 15:17:52 -0700, Mercy-a-lago <run@no.spam>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, 22 Feb 2025 13:38:02 -0800
>>>>> Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>>>      
>>>>>> On 2025-02-22 13:03, pothead wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2025-02-22, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2025-02-22 12:38, Mercy-a-lago wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 22 Feb 2025 12:32:00 -0800 Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-02-22 09:15, tye syding wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 19:02:55 -0800 Siri Cruise
>>>>>>>>>>> <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>        
>>>>>>>>>>>> Musk's political hit squad. He declares as waste his
>>>>>>>>>>>> political enemies. He lies and declares waste which you
>>>>>>>>>>>> cretins
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Stupid meth whore.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.foxnews.com/politics/doge-takes-chainsaw-federal-
>>>>>>>>>>> spending-7-major-victories-week-got-done
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> DOGE finds a nearly untraceable budget line item responsible
>>>>>>>>>>> for $4.7T in payments Earlier this week, DOGE announced it
>>>>>>>>>>> had discovered an identification code linking U.S. Treasury
>>>>>>>>>>> payments to a budget line item, which accounts for nearly
>>>>>>>>>>> $4.7 trillion in payments, that was oftentimes left blank.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "The Treasury Access Symbol (TAS) is an identification code
>>>>>>>>>>> linking a Treasury payment to a budget line item (standard
>>>>>>>>>>> financial process)," DOGE wrote in a post on X.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> "In the Federal Government, the TAS field was optional for
>>>>>>>>>>> ~$4.7 Trillion in payments and was often left blank, making
>>>>>>>>>>> traceability almost impossible. As of Saturday, this is now
>>>>>>>>>>> a required field, increasing insight into where money is
>>>>>>>>>>> actually going."
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The agency thanked the U.S. Treasury for its work in
>>>>>>>>>>> identifying the optional field.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> According to the Bureau of the Fiscal Service, which is
>>>>>>>>>>> under the Treasury, TAS codes are used to describe any one
>>>>>>>>>>> of the account identification codes assigned by the
>>>>>>>>>>> Treasury and are also referred to as the "account."
>>>>>>>>>>>        
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "$4.7 Trillion" so scary.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> My question:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Over what period of time?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What part of _almost impossible tracing_ got past you?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://nypost.com/2025/02/17/us-news/doge-discovers-4-7-trillion-in-
>>>>>>>>> treasury-payments-were-missing-critical-code/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) announced
>>>>>>>>> Monday that some $4.7 trillion in payments from the Treasury
>>>>>>>>> Department were missing a critical tracking code, which made
>>>>>>>>> tracing the transactions “almost impossible.”
>>>>>>>> What part of "over what period of time" confused you?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There are obviously individual records of expenditures.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Those records allegedly lack a particular code.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Does that mean they aren't dated?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It means they are difficult if not impossible to track/trace.
>>>>>> As to their PURPOSE, perhaps (assuming we're getting all the
>>>>>> facts.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But obviously, there is an amount being claimed for each of the
>>>>>> records found.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And those records almost certainly have dates, so I ask again:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Over what time period?
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you ever relent to reality?
>>>>>
>>>>> "The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) announced Monday
>>>>> that some $4.7 trillion in payments from the Treasury Department
>>>>> were missing a critical tracking code, which made tracing the
>>>>> transactions “almost impossible.”
>>>>
>>>> To repeat:  Over what time period?
>>>
>>> "$4.7 trillion in payments from the Treasury Department
>>> were missing a critical tracking code, which made tracing the
>>> transactions “almost impossible.”
>>>
>>>    
>>
>> If all the data was "impossible" to track, where did the dollar
>> figure come from?
> 
>  From what they DID find, duh.
> 
>> The fact is that those records were ONLY lacking a TAS.
> 
> Then maybe they have more than they're telling us, ya think maybe?
You really don't understand any of this, do you?