Davin News Server

On 2025-02-23, Mercy-a-lago <run@no.spam> wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Feb 2025 22:36:20 -0500
> Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 22 Feb 2025 15:17:52 -0700, Mercy-a-lago <run@no.spam> wrote:
>> 
>> >On Sat, 22 Feb 2025 13:38:02 -0800
>> >Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>> >  
>> >> On 2025-02-22 13:03, pothead wrote:  
>> >> > On 2025-02-22, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:    
>> >> >> On 2025-02-22 12:38, Mercy-a-lago wrote:    
>> >> >>> On Sat, 22 Feb 2025 12:32:00 -0800 Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
>> >> >>> wrote: 
>> >> >>>> On 2025-02-22 09:15, tye syding wrote:    
>> >> >>>>> On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 19:02:55 -0800 Siri Cruise
>> >> >>>>> <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >> >>>>>    
>> >> >>>>>> Musk's political hit squad. He declares as waste his
>> >> >>>>>> political enemies. He lies and declares waste which you
>> >> >>>>>> cretins    
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> Stupid meth whore.
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> https://www.foxnews.com/politics/doge-takes-chainsaw-federal-
>> >> >>>>> spending-7-major-victories-week-got-done
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> DOGE finds a nearly untraceable budget line item responsible
>> >> >>>>> for $4.7T in payments Earlier this week, DOGE announced it
>> >> >>>>> had discovered an identification code linking U.S. Treasury
>> >> >>>>> payments to a budget line item, which accounts for nearly
>> >> >>>>> $4.7 trillion in payments, that was oftentimes left blank.
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> "The Treasury Access Symbol (TAS) is an identification code
>> >> >>>>> linking a Treasury payment to a budget line item (standard
>> >> >>>>> financial process)," DOGE wrote in a post on X.
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> "In the Federal Government, the TAS field was optional for
>> >> >>>>> ~$4.7 Trillion in payments and was often left blank, making
>> >> >>>>> traceability almost impossible. As of Saturday, this is now a
>> >> >>>>> required field, increasing insight into where money is
>> >> >>>>> actually going."
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> The agency thanked the U.S. Treasury for its work in
>> >> >>>>> identifying the optional field.
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> According to the Bureau of the Fiscal Service, which is under
>> >> >>>>> the Treasury, TAS codes are used to describe any one of the
>> >> >>>>> account identification codes assigned by the Treasury and are
>> >> >>>>> also referred to as the "account."
>> >> >>>>>    
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> "$4.7 Trillion" so scary.
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> My question:
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> Over what period of time?    
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> What part of _almost impossible tracing_ got past you?
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> https://nypost.com/2025/02/17/us-news/doge-discovers-4-7-trillion-in-
>> >> >>> treasury-payments-were-missing-critical-code/
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) announced Monday
>> >> >>> that some $4.7 trillion in payments from the Treasury
>> >> >>> Department were missing a critical tracking code, which made
>> >> >>> tracing the transactions “almost impossible.”    
>> >> >> What part of "over what period of time" confused you?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> There are obviously individual records of expenditures.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Those records allegedly lack a particular code.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Does that mean they aren't dated?    
>> >> > 
>> >> > It means they are difficult if not impossible to track/trace.    
>> >> As to their PURPOSE, perhaps (assuming we're getting all the facts.
>> >> 
>> >> But obviously, there is an amount being claimed for each of the
>> >> records found.
>> >> 
>> >> And those records almost certainly have dates, so I ask again:
>> >> 
>> >> Over what time period?  
>> >
>> >Do you ever relent to reality?
>> >
>> >"The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) announced Monday
>> >that some $4.7 trillion in payments from the Treasury Department
>> >were missing a critical tracking code, which made tracing the
>> >transactions “almost impossible.”    
>> 
>> To repeat:  Over what time period?  
>
> "$4.7 trillion in payments from the Treasury Department
> were missing a critical tracking code, which made tracing the
> transactions “almost impossible.”  
>
>
Newsmax had a forensic accountant on today and he discussed this very topic.
The tracking code number ties the check or transaction to a specific budget line item, so
what fund is it coming from and where is it going specifically.
Without the tracking number it's pretty much impossible to determine what the money
was for, where it was taken from and where it went.



-- 
pothead

Why did Joe Biden pardon his family?
Read below to learn the reason.
The Biden Crime Family Timeline here:
https://oversight.house.gov/the-bidens-influence-peddling-timeline/