From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.global-warming,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: Get Your Dinghy's Ready! - Oh, And Have A Boat Too!
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2025 14:51:17 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2025-02-23 14:15, Mercy-a-lago wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Feb 2025 14:03:11 -0800
> Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2025-02-23 13:33, Mercy-a-lago wrote:
>>> On Sun, 23 Feb 2025 12:26:50 -0800
>>> Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2025-02-23 11:47, Mercy-a-lago wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 23 Feb 2025 10:53:38 -0800
>>>>> Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> What do you have against easier navigation and passage?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> First of all, let's be clear:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Are you admitting that it is happening?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Because the only way you get "easier navigation and passage" is
>>>>>> if the Arctic gets to ice-free.
>>>>>
>>>>> Which has happened, due to jet stream perturbations.
>>>>
>>>> Name a SINGLE TIME that ANY PASSAGE through the Arctic has been ice
>>>> free.
>>>
>>> That's your necessity for "easier navigation and passage" - not
>>> mine.
>>
>> You claimed the the Arctic being "ice-free" "has happened".
>>
>> Clue time: it hasn't.
>
> It's gone to as low as 25%, possibly less for a short time - close
> enough.
Not for navigation and passage it's not.
But moreover, the world isn't in desperate need of "navigation and
passage" through the Arctic.