From: Mercy-a-lago <run@no.spam>
Newsgroups: alt.global-warming,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: Get Your Dinghy's Ready! - Oh, And Have A Boat Too!
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2025 16:12:34 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On Sun, 23 Feb 2025 14:51:17 -0800
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
> On 2025-02-23 14:15, Mercy-a-lago wrote:
> > On Sun, 23 Feb 2025 14:03:11 -0800
> > Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On 2025-02-23 13:33, Mercy-a-lago wrote:
> >>> On Sun, 23 Feb 2025 12:26:50 -0800
> >>> Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On 2025-02-23 11:47, Mercy-a-lago wrote:
> >>>>> On Sun, 23 Feb 2025 10:53:38 -0800
> >>>>> Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>> What do you have against easier navigation and passage?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> First of all, let's be clear:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Are you admitting that it is happening?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Because the only way you get "easier navigation and passage" is
> >>>>>> if the Arctic gets to ice-free.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Which has happened, due to jet stream perturbations.
> >>>>
> >>>> Name a SINGLE TIME that ANY PASSAGE through the Arctic has been
> >>>> ice free.
> >>>
> >>> That's your necessity for "easier navigation and passage" - not
> >>> mine.
> >>
> >> You claimed the the Arctic being "ice-free" "has happened".
> >>
> >> Clue time: it hasn't.
> >
> > It's gone to as low as 25%, possibly less for a short time - close
> > enough.
> Not for navigation and passage it's not.
Your polar navigation resume is where?
> But moreover, the world isn't in desperate need of "navigation and
> passage" through the Arctic.
Why so expansive a metric as "the world"?
That's a strawman.