From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.global-warming,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: Get Your Dinghy's Ready! - Oh, And Have A Boat Too!
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2025 15:19:57 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2025-02-23 15:12, Mercy-a-lago wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Feb 2025 14:51:17 -0800
> Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2025-02-23 14:15, Mercy-a-lago wrote:
>>> On Sun, 23 Feb 2025 14:03:11 -0800
>>> Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2025-02-23 13:33, Mercy-a-lago wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 23 Feb 2025 12:26:50 -0800
>>>>> Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2025-02-23 11:47, Mercy-a-lago wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sun, 23 Feb 2025 10:53:38 -0800
>>>>>>> Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What do you have against easier navigation and passage?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> First of all, let's be clear:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Are you admitting that it is happening?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Because the only way you get "easier navigation and passage" is
>>>>>>>> if the Arctic gets to ice-free.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Which has happened, due to jet stream perturbations.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Name a SINGLE TIME that ANY PASSAGE through the Arctic has been
>>>>>> ice free.
>>>>>
>>>>> That's your necessity for "easier navigation and passage" - not
>>>>> mine.
>>>>
>>>> You claimed the the Arctic being "ice-free" "has happened".
>>>>
>>>> Clue time: it hasn't.
>>>
>>> It's gone to as low as 25%, possibly less for a short time - close
>>> enough.
>> Not for navigation and passage it's not.
>
> Your polar navigation resume is where?
Commercial vessels cannot pass through the Arctic ice pack.
This is not highly specialized and/or secret knowledge.
>
>> But moreover, the world isn't in desperate need of "navigation and
>> passage" through the Arctic.
>
> Why so expansive a metric as "the world"?
>
> That's a strawman.
So who needs it?