Davin News Server

On 2025-02-23 16:09, Mercy-a-lago wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Feb 2025 15:59:39 -0800 Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 2025-02-23 15:54, Mercy-a-lago wrote:
>>> On Sun, 23 Feb 2025 15:37:20 -0800 Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On 2025-02-23 15:33, Mercy-a-lago wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 23 Feb 2025 15:29:52 -0800 Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 2025-02-23 13:55, Mercy-a-lago wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sun, 23 Feb 2025 13:49:47 -0800 Siri Cruise
>>>>>>> <chine.bleu@www.yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> -hh wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 2/23/25 14:40, Mercy-a-lago wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 23 Feb 2025 10:49:53 -0800 Alan <nuh-
>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-02-23 10:44, Mercy-a-lago wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 22 Feb 2025 22:12:39 -0500 Governor
>>>>>>>>>>>> Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> There is a difference between natural
>>>>>>>>>>>>> climate cycles and what's happening now.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> The magnetosphere is down over 30%.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Cite where that fluctuation is "natural".
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> What happens when it hits zero?
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Cite that that's a fact.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Answer where the magnetosphere is now and why the 
>>>>>>>>>> measurements stopped being shared.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Northern lights in the south much?
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> The aurora borealis occurs in the Arctic,
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> The aurora australis occurs in Antarctica.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> -hh
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Aurora randomlis will appear everywhere and the
>>>>>>>> magnetic field becomes chaotic.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Already occurring:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/why-the-northern-
>>>>>>> lights-are-being-seen-further-south
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> https://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-10880852
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> https://www.foxcarolina.com/page/why-are-the-northern-
>>>>>>> lights-moving-south/
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/national-international/
>>>>>>> northern-lights-why-were-they-visible-further-south-than-
>>>>>>> normal/5881243/
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Each one address and not one so much as mentioned a
>>>>>> weakening magnetic field as a cause.
>>>>> 
>>>>> You can use your EYES to SEE the results, ya terminally dim
>>>>> bulb!
>>>>> 
>>>>> Damn, one would think a canucklehead would know some of
>>>>> this.
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> The northern lights have been seen further south because of 
>>>> extremely strong solar flares.
>>> 
>>> Nope.
>>> 
>>> They were far less than the Carington event.
>> How would the fact that they were less than an earlier event
>> matter?
> 
> I'm actually GLAD you asked that!
> 
> Because their visibility far south demonstrates how far the 
> magnetosphere has weakened!
> 
> See...you can do this, bunny.
> 
>> During the Carington event the northern lights were seen MUCH
>> farther south than the last couple of solar flare events.
> 
> It was a much bigger event after all.
> 
> https://www.swsc-journal.org/articles/swsc/pdf/2013/01/
> swsc130015.pdf
> 
> The solar flare on 1 September 1859 and its associated geomagnetic
> storm remain the standard for an extreme solar-terrestrial event.
> The most recent estimates of the flare soft X-ray (SXR) peak
> intensity and Dst magnetic storm index for this event are: SXR class
> = X45 (±5) (vs. X35 (±5) for the 4 November 2003 flare) and minimum
> Dst = 900 (+50, 150) nT (vs. 825 to 900 nT for the great storm of
> May 1921). We have no direct evidence of an associated solar
> energetic proton (SEP) event but a correlation between >30 MeV SEP
> fluence (F30) and flare size based on modern data yields a best
> guess F30 value of ~1.1 · 1010 pr cm2 (with the ±1r uncertainty
> spanning a range from ~109 –1011 pr cm2 ) for a composite (multi-
> flare plus shock) 1859 event. This value is approximately twice that
> of estimates/measurements – ranging from ~5–7 · 109 pr cm2 – for the
> largest SEP episodes (July 1959, November 1960, August 1972) in the
> modern era.
> 
> 
> 
> But of course we have even more Aurora displays down to the equator 
> this time.

Cite for that, please!

> 
>> Places like south-central Mexico and Cuba.
> 
> Right, and not long ago:
> 
> https://www.forbes.com/sites/jamiecartereurope/2023/04/24/in-photos-
> northern-lights-seen-as-far-as-us-mexico-border-as-massive-solar-
> storm-arrives/

"US Mexico border" is NOT NEAR the equator.

> 
> https://www.usnews.com/news/world/articles/2024-05-11/auroras-dazzle-
> in-latin-america-as-solar-storm-causes-rare-displays
> 
> A view shows the lights of an aurora australis caused by a
> geomagnetic storm over Villarrica volcano, in Pucon, Chile May 10,
> 2024. REUTERS/Cristobal Saavedra Escobar

"aurora australis" means lights from the SOUTH polar region, dumbass.

So not an example of how far south the NORTHERN lights were being seen.



> 
> MEXICO CITY (Reuters) - The biggest geomagnetic storm in two
> decades, sparked by solar flares, caused dazzling lights displays in
> parts of Latin America overnight on Friday, including a rare
> appearance in Mexico.
> 
> In Mexicali, a desert city on Mexico's northern border thousands of
> miles from the Arctic regions where the northern lights are common,
> gradients of pink and purple illuminated the night sky.
> 
> The civil protection agency in Mexicali's state of Baja California
> said more auroras could be visible on Saturday evening.
> 
> You should quit while you're losing, moron.
You should learn just how much farther south Cuba is than Mexicali.