From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: Cantgaydian Faggot Proves My Point - Joint Chiefs of Staff All
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 11:33:37 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2025-02-25 19:03, AlleyCat wrote:
>
> On Tue, 25 Feb 2025 18:50:26 -0800, Alan says...
>
>>>> And no one ever said it wasn't legal, so that's a straw man.
>>>
>>> LOL.
>>>
>>> See... here's YOUR problem.
>>>
>>> You can't refute what I said, so you pick on something I'm actually
>>> right about, but YOU don't think so, because the numbers aren't 100%
>>> (how fucking pansy-ass pussy pedantic!), so you argue bullshit
>>> semantics and the minutiae of the topic.
>>
>> I did refute what you said.
>>
>> Your implication was clear: that it was normal for presidents to get rid
>> of a CJCS if he was appointed by the previous president if he as from
>> the other party.
>>
>> You were wrong.
>>
>> What fascinates me now is your utter unwillingness to just admit you
>> were wrong.
>
> I'm not wrong.
>
> I'm just not 100% correct... exactly JUST like you.
Since your argument was that it is normal for an incoming president to
replace a CJCS appointed by a president from the other party, you were
100% wrong.