Davin News Server

From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: Can Presidents "Fire" Senior Military Officers? Yes
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2025 19:43:21 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider

On 2025-02-28 19:40, AlleyCat wrote:
> 
> On Fri, 28 Feb 2025 16:59:29 -0800,  Alan says...
> 
>> 
>> On 2025-02-28 16:46, AlleyCat wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Tue, 25 Feb 2025 15:04:50 -0800,  Alan says...
>>> 
>>>>> A journalist recently asked me whether a President could
>>>>> "fire" a general. The answer - pardon the pun - is
>>>>> generally, yes.
>>>> 
>>>> Except it was never about whether a president COULD fire
>>>> someone.
>>> 
>>> Ummm... yes. Yes, it was.
>>> 
>>> Ummm... never? Never's a long time, AND it's retroactive.
>> 
>> Ummmm... nope.
>> 
>>> 
>>> Stupid.
>>> 
>>> Subject: Trump Fires BLACK MAN, Replaces With WHITE MAN. No
>>> Surprise There....
>>> 
>>> (as IF he wasn't allowed to)
>> 
>> Learn what "infer" means versus "imply".
> 
> Yeah, Lee implied Trump fired Brown, because he was Black and made
> it seem he didn't have the right, and again... as IF he wasn't
> allowed to.

There was nothing in there--no implication whatsoever--about Trump not 
being allowed to.

> 
> I'll infer whatever the FUCK I WANT to infer, and your opinion of
> that doesn't count for shit, faggot. I suppose YOU have a different
> inference?

Your inference doesn't define what the OP meant.