From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: Bradley K. SpermMan Lives UNDER Mommy's Basement
Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2025 12:02:58 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2025-02-28 22:00, AlleyCat wrote:
>
> On Fri, 28 Feb 2025 20:16:40 -0800, Alan says...
>
>>
>> On 2025-02-28 19:40, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, 28 Feb 2025 16:56:51 -0800, Alan says...
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 2025-02-28 16:46, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 25 Feb 2025 14:42:13 -0800, Alan says...
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Doesn't help, when liberal progressive gay, faggot and Drag Queen-
>>>>>>> loving judges are blocking access to records.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is that this week's excuse?
>>>>>
>>>>> A fact is now an "excuse"?
>>>
>>>> How is a claim by you a "fact"?
>>>
>>> When they ARE facts... faggot.
>>>
>>> "Judge Continues To Block Musk, DOGE From Treasury Data While Mulling Injunction" - ABCNews
>>> "Federal Judge Blocks Elon Musk's DOGE Access To Critical Treasury Payment System" - CNN
>>> "Judge Orders Sweeping Restriction on DOGE Access To Sensitive Treasury Payment Systems" - Poltico
>>> "Judge Blocks Elon Musk's Team From Accessing Federal Payment Systems" = USAToday
>>> "Judge Blocks Musk, DOGE From Accessing Treasury Payment Systems" - TheHill
>>>
>>> So, is that a "claim" or is that a fact?
>>>
>>> ABCNews, CNN, Poltico, USAToday and TheHill, all say it's a FACT.
>> They don't say anything about "liberal", "progressive", "gay", "faggot"
>> or "drag queen-loving" in any of those...
>
> You lose again.
>
> You asked if this was an excuse... not whether the adjectives were factual.
The excuse is that you're stating that the judges are ruling against
Trump and DOGE because they are "liberal progressive gay, faggot and
Drag Queen- loving"
>
> Doesn't help, when liberal progressive gay, faggot and Drag Queen-loving judges are blocking access to records.
>
> Poor little rich kid. Gets proven wrong again, and resorts to attacking that which wasn't the point.
>
> THIS was the point and you know it.
>
> "Judge Continues To Block Musk, DOGE From Treasury Data While Mulling Injunction" - ABCNews
> "Federal Judge Blocks Elon Musk's DOGE Access To Critical Treasury Payment System" - CNN
> "Judge Orders Sweeping Restriction on DOGE Access To Sensitive Treasury Payment Systems" - Politico
> "Judge Blocks Elon Musk's Team From Accessing Federal Payment Systems" = USAToday
> "Judge Blocks Musk, DOGE From Accessing Treasury Payment Systems" - TheHill
>
> Just pretend my adjectives were prepositions.
>
> "Doesn't help, when judges are blocking access to records."
Prove that that is happening...
>
> You lose again... rich kid.
My, my, my...
...so many posts at 1am on a Friday night.
What a great life you must have!