From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics
Subject: Re: Can Someone PLEASE Tell Me Why ANYONE Would Protest Against
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2025 13:41:30 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2025-02-11 13:05, AlleyCat wrote:
>
> RIGHT NOW: Democrats are marching in DC to protest DOGE's crackdown on government waste.
>
> https://video.twimg.com/ext_tw_video/1889368757031632897/pu/vid/avc1/1280x720/TruOg34m0PsufHiv.mp4?tag=12
>
> Anyone who would protest AGAINST government waste, has GOT to be fucked-in-head.
>
> Liberalism Really IS a Disease
Before we answer that question, how about you show that any waste has
actually been found:
'After we published a public audit on Saturday, Elon Muskâs DOGE deleted
hundreds more claims from its mistake-plagued âwall of receipts,â wiping
out an additional $4 billion in so-called savings that the group had
claimed to secure for U.S. taxpayers. By late Sunday night, DOGE had
erased or altered more than 1,000 contracts it previously claimed to
have canceledâamounting to over 40% of all contracts listed on its site
last week.'
And if you want to know where that came from...
...Google it.
'As billionaire Elon Muskâs Department of Government Efficiency scours
federal agencies for cost savings, Musk and his team have repeatedly
made baseless or false claims about government spendingâor exaggerated
the level of fraud and waste uncovered at some agencies.'
<https://www.forbes.com/sites/conormurray/2025/02/19/here-are-the-biggest-doge-hoaxes-and-inaccuracies-as-8-million-canceled-ice-contract-listed-at-8-billion/>
Wow. I guess Forbes is left-wing now, huh Phil?
'Many false and misleading claims about government spending practices by
various agenciesâincluding USAID and the Federal Emergency Management
Agencyâhave spread quickly on X, propped up by billionaires including
Musk and Bill Ackman.'
'DID DOGE SAVE $8 BILLION BY CUTTING ONE ICE CONTRACT?
No. DOGE published a list of cost savings on its website earlier this
week, and one of the largest was a purported $8 billion canceled
technical support contract for Immigration and Customs Enforcementâs
Office of Diversity and Civil Rights dating back to 2022, according to
the New York Times. However, while the contract was initially valued at
$8 billion, the price tag was later updated to a much more modest $8
million on Jan. 22, 2025. Just $2.5 million was spent on the contract,
suggesting DOGE saved only $5.5 million. DOGEâs site now lists the
contractâs savings at just $8 million.'
'IS THERE WIDESPREAD SOCIAL SECURITY FRAUD?
Musk has claimed the Social Security Administration is riddled with mass
fraud, including scores of payments made to dead peopleâand White House
Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said âtens of millionsâ are receiving
fraudulent payments. However, while Social Security fraud certainly
exists, thereâs no evidence it takes place at anywhere near the scale
Musk and Leavitt have claimed.'
'DID FEMA SPEND $59 MILLION ON HOUSING MIGRANTS IN NYC LUXURY HOTELS?
No. Although FEMA did allocate $59 million to New York last week as part
of a payment package approved last year, Musk made multiple misleading
claims about the payment in a post on X on Monday. Contrary to Muskâs
post, the money sent to New York was not âdisaster reliefâ and came from
a pool of money separate from FEMAâs disaster efforts. The money was
approved by Congress last year as part of the Shelter and Services
Program, which FEMA administers alongside the U.S. Customs and Border
Protection. New York was allocated about $237 million as a partial
reimbursement for the about $7 billion it has spent on housing migrants,
The New York Times reported, and a $59 million payment was made last
week as part of this allocation. Of that payment, about $19 million was
spent on hotel fees, but contrary to Muskâs post, New York officials
said these payments were not made on luxury hotels. Also unlike Muskâs
post, New York officials said they have not received any request to
return the money.'
There's a lot more there...
...but we know you won't read it, will you?
:-)