From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics
Subject: Re: I Told You Rich Kid - We Don't NEED Your Lumber
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 10:58:56 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2025-03-09 20:40, AlleyCat wrote:
>
> On Sun, 9 Mar 2025 14:11:02 -0700, Alan says...
>
>>
>> On 2025-03-08 18:30, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, 8 Mar 2025 18:12:53 -0800, Alan says...
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 2025-03-08 18:03, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, 8 Mar 2025 11:55:25 -0800, Alan says...
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2025-03-07 21:31, AlleyCat wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> President Trump: "What we're doing is freeing up our forests from the environmental nonsense that they put on them, where you can't cut down a tree."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Canada has been ripping us off for years on tariffs for lumber!"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://x.com/i/status/1898058946339897426
>>>>>
>>>>>> Quick question:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Who negotiated and signed the current trade deal between the US, Canada
>>>>>> and Mexico?
>>>>>
>>>>> Quick question:
>>>>>
>>>>> Who kept, for 4 years, the negotiated and signed current trade deal between
>>>>> the US, Canada and Mexico, which will no longer BE current, because it is
>>>>> outdated and needs to be amended?
>>>>>
>>>>> Time to sign a different one.
>>>>>
>>>>> I told you... We Don't NEED Your Lumber, rich boy.
>>>
>>>> Who was it who negotiated it?
>>>
>>> But, was it really?
>>>
>>>> Hint: it's the same guy who's now claiming it was a terrible deal.
>>>
>>> It is... because it's outdated and needs to be amended.
>>
>> So why did Trump sign it?
>
> Because it was good at the time.
>
> But...
>
> https://i.imgur.com/bXa9u7N.mp4
>
>>>
>>> Today, do you think OUR Founding Fathers could look at the Constitution and
>>> say, "Everything looks perfect... no changes needed"?
>>>
>>> Then, why were there AMENDMENTS?
>>>
>>> Time to write and sign a better trade deal... for today, stupid.
>> So things are so very different now, are they?
>>
>> He called the trade deal HE SIGNED "terrible".
>
> Jes.
>
> It isn't harsh or punitive enough for NOW, stupid.
>
> Did he mean it was terrible when he signed it?
>
> No.
Yes.
That is precisely what he said about it:
âWho would ever sign a thing like this?â