From: AlleyCat <katt@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.global-warming,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: How Desperate You Fucks Have Become - Episode #3,848 - I Want My Global WARMING! - March Almost Over And It's Still In The Lower 50s! - Next Week, Even COLDER!
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2025 08:10:06 -0500
Organization: AlleyCat Computing, Inc.
Climate Scientists Say... .
"There are a growing number of signs that we may be descending into another Little Ice Age"
Science and Technology Magazine
Read the latest on global cooling in the Laurence Hecht's "Is Nature Warning Us of a New Ice Age?" and
Is a New Ice Age Under Way?
by Laurence Hecht
"Watch out, Al Gore. The glaciers will get you!" With that appended note, my friend, retired
field geologist Jack Sauers, forwarded to me a report that should have been a lead item in
every newspaper in the world. It was the news that the best-measured glacier in North
America, the Nisqually on Mount Rainier, has been growing since 1931.
The significance of the fact, immediately grasped by any competent climatologist, is that
glacial advance is an early warning sign of Northern Hemisphere chilling of the sort that can
bring on an Ice Age. The last Little Ice Age continued from about 1400 to 1850. It was
followed by a period of slight warming. There are a growing number of signs that we may be
descending into another Little Ice Age-all the mountains of "global warming" propaganda
aside.
Our current understanding of the long-term climate cycles shows that for the past 800,000
years, periods of approximately 100,000 years" duration, called Ice Ages, have been
interrupted by periods of approximately 10,000 years, known as Interglacials. (We are now
about 10,500 years into the present Interglacial.)
==================================================
Climate Change/Global Warming/CO² Explains EVERYTHING!
Climate Change/Global Warming/CO² makes for shorter winters, except for when it makes for longer winters.
Climate Change/Global Warming/CO² means less snow, except for when Climate Change/Global Warming/CO² means more snow.
And Climate Change/Global Warming/CO² causes droughts in California and floods in Texas and Oklahoma and generally makes wet
places wetter and dry places dryer, except when it makes wet places drier and dry places wetter, except when none of that changes
at all, and then Climate Change/Global Warming/CO² explains that too!
And Climate Change/Global Warming/CO² causes more hurricanes at the same time as it causes less hurricanes.
Climate Change/Global Warming/CO² causes more rain but less water... and less rain but more water?
And Climate Change/Global Warming/CO² causes more water vapour in the atmosphere, at the same time it causes less rain... and
less water vapour in the atmosphere, when it causes MORE rain?
Climate Change/Global Warming/CO² decreases the spread of malaria at the same time as it increases the spread of malaria.
Climate Change/Global Warming/CO² makes San Francisco foggier... Climate Change/Global Warming/CO² makes San Francisco less
foggy.
Climate Change/Global Warming/CO² causes duller autumn leaves... Climate Change/Global Warming/CO² causes shinier autumn leaves.
Climate Change/Global Warming/CO² makes for less salty seas... Climate Change/Global Warming/CO² makes for saltier seas.
Climate Change/Global Warming/CO² causes the polar ice caps to melt... Climate Change/Global Warming/CO² also causes the polar
ice caps to freeze.
Climate Change/Global Warming/CO² makes the Earth hotter, unless the Earth isn't getting hotter... in which case, Climate
Change/Global Warming/CO² can explain that too.
What's the problem here? This sounds like the perfect scientific theory. It can explain literally everything including self
contradictory things.
This means it's absolutely perfect, doesn't it?
Well no, not according to Karl Popper and the philosophers of science and within the philosophy of science there's something
called the demarcation problem... how do you differentiate science from pseudo-science?
The left won't LET you, and brands you a denierrrrrrr(whining).