From: super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.trump, can.politics
Subject: Re: Nothing quite says "incompetence"...
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2025 16:17:49 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2025-03-25 20:22:15 +0000, Skeeter said:
> In article <7ZBEP.70099$D41.43643@fx45.iad>,
> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>
>> On 3/24/2025 8:48 PM, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <vrt785$1u3up$15@dont-email.me>, nuh-
>>> uh@nope.com says...
>>>>
>>>> On 2025-03-24 20:14, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>> In article <vrt5mh$1u3up$12@dont-email.me>, nuh-
>>>>> uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2025-03-24 19:47, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <vrt1nn$26kf2$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>> super70s@super70s.invalid says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2025-03-25 00:22:27 +0000, Skeeter said:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In article <vrso3b$1u3up$1@dont-email.me>, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com >
>>>>>>>>> says...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ...like accidentally including a "The Atlantic" reporter on your Signal
>>>>>>>>>> group chat to discuss your attack plans for Yemen.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> How is your trolling working out for you.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It's the trolls who are running the current government.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cry baby cry.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dude,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Your administration is so incompetent that they included a reporter for
>>>>>> The Atlantic on a top-secret Signal chat about attacking Yemen.
>>>>>
>>>>> That has already been debunked. Now go burn something.
>>>>
>>>> It has?
>>>>
>>>> Show it.
>>>
>>> I already told you.
>>
>> No, you didn't. You didn't cite a thing to show this fictional "debunking."
>>
>> The story has not been "debunked." We only have Trump's incompetent clowns
>> downplaying it. That's not "debunking."
>
> It's over. Moving along now.
It'll be moved along from about as much as Hillary's emails which were
10x less egregious a security threat.
What's good for the goose, etc.