Davin News Server

From: Skeeter <none@none.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.trump,can.politics
Subject: Re: Nothing quite says "incompetence"...
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2025 16:21:54 -0600
Organization: UTB

In article <vrv6ht$6etd$1@dont-email.me>, 
super70s@super70s.invalid says...
> 
> On 2025-03-25 20:22:15 +0000, Skeeter said:
> 
> > In article <7ZBEP.70099$D41.43643@fx45.iad>,
> > mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
> >> 
> >> On 3/24/2025 8:48 PM, Skeeter wrote:
> >>> In article <vrt785$1u3up$15@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> >>> uh@nope.com says...
> >>>> 
> >>>> On 2025-03-24 20:14, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>> In article <vrt5mh$1u3up$12@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> >>>>> uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> On 2025-03-24 19:47, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>> In article <vrt1nn$26kf2$1@dont-email.me>,
> >>>>>>> super70s@super70s.invalid says...
> >>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>> On 2025-03-25 00:22:27 +0000, Skeeter said:
> >>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>> In article <vrso3b$1u3up$1@dont-email.me>, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com >
> >>>>>>>>> says...
> >>>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>>> ...like accidentally including a "The Atlantic" reporter on your Signal
> >>>>>>>>>> group chat to discuss your attack plans for Yemen.
> >>>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>>> How is your trolling working out for you.
> >>>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>>> It's the trolls who are running the current government.
> >>>>>>> 
> >>>>>>> Cry baby cry.
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> Dude,
> >>>>>> 
> >>>>>> Your administration is so incompetent that they included a reporter for
> >>>>>> The Atlantic on a top-secret Signal chat about attacking Yemen.
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> That has already been debunked. Now go burn something.
> >>>> 
> >>>> It has?
> >>>> 
> >>>> Show it.
> >>> 
> >>> I already told you.
> >> 
> >> No, you didn't. You didn't cite a thing to show this fictional "debunking."
> >> 
> >> The story has not been "debunked." We only have Trump's incompetent clowns
> >> downplaying it. That's not "debunking."
> > 
> > It's over. Moving along now.
> 
> It'll be moved along from about as much as Hillary's emails which were 
> 10x less egregious a security threat.

How do you know what they said? Have you read them? Oh yea 
she destroyed them. I wonder why.
> 
> What's good for the goose, etc.

No classified info was discussed.