From: Skeeter <none@none.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.trump,can.politics
Subject: Re: Nothing quite says "incompetence"...
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2025 16:26:34 -0600
Organization: UTB
In article <vrv902$33t9$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
>
> On 2025-03-25 13:33, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <vrv372$34ao$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
> > says...
> >>
> >> On 2025-03-25 10:37, Skeeter wrote:
> >>> In article <vrukht$3kgoj$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
> >>> says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2025-03-25 08:46, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>> In article <vruiqq$3kg8d$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
> >>>>> says...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 2025-03-25 04:10, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>> In article <vrt9lq$2br2p$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
> >>>>>>> says...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 2025-03-24 20:48, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> In article <vrt785$1u3up$15@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> >>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On 2025-03-24 20:14, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> In article <vrt5mh$1u3up$12@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> >>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-03-24 19:47, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vrt1nn$26kf2$1@dont-email.me>,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> super70s@super70s.invalid says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-03-25 00:22:27 +0000, Skeeter said:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vrso3b$1u3up$1@dont-email.me>, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com >
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...like accidentally including a "The Atlantic" reporter on your Signal
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> group chat to discuss your attack plans for Yemen.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How is your trolling working out for you.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's the trolls who are running the current government.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Cry baby cry.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Dude,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Your administration is so incompetent that they included a reporter for
> >>>>>>>>>>>> The Atlantic on a top-secret Signal chat about attacking Yemen.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> That has already been debunked. Now go burn something.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> It has?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Show it.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I already told you. You are just a kick toy. Go look it
> >>>>>>>>> up.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> So you have nothing...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> ...again.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Debunked.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> It absolutely happened.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> But not like they are saying. I'm watching the hearings.
> >>>>
> >>>> How do you claim it was different than what I posted?
> >>>
> >>> Because left hand media isnt in my house.
> >>
> >> Avoiding the question, so let me rephrase:
> >>
> >> You claim it is "not like they are saying".
> >>
> >> In what WAY is it different?
> >
> > No one mentioned anything classified.
>
> 'At 11:44 a.m., the account labeled ?Pete Hegseth? posted in Signal a
> ?TEAM UPDATE.? I will not quote from this update, or from certain other
> subsequent texts. The information contained in them, if they had been
> read by an adversary of the United States, could conceivably have been
> used to harm American military and intelligence personnel, particularly
> in the broader Middle East, Central Command?s area of responsibility.
> What I will say, in order to illustrate the shocking recklessness of
> this Signal conversation, is that the Hegseth post contained operational
> details of forthcoming strikes on Yemen, including information about
> targets, weapons the U.S. would be deploying, and attack sequencing.'
>
> Let me emphasize the last bit:
>
> '...the Hegseth post contained operational details of forthcoming
> strikes on Yemen, including information about targets, weapons the U.S.
> would be deploying, and attack sequencing.'
>
I notice there is no source. Why is that?
>
> >>
> >>>>
> >>>> The editor of The Atlantic was added to a group chat on Signal.
> >>>
> >>> So?
> >>>>
> >>>> The subject of the group chat was the US attacks about to be launched
> >>>> against Yemen and included operational details.
> >>>
> >>> The attacks have already taken place. Old news.
> >> Nope. He explicitly stated that he was in a chat BEFORE the attacks
> >> occurred.
> >
> > It happened so we move forward.
> So now you acknowledge he was on the chat before the attacks.
I never said he wasn't. Stop spinning shit.