Davin News Server

From: Skeeter <none@none.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.trump,can.politics
Subject: Re: Nothing quite says "incompetence"...
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2025 17:10:27 -0600
Organization: UTB

In article <vrvbcn$ap3j$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com 
says...
> 
> On 2025-03-25 15:26, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <vrv902$33t9$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
> > says...
> >>
> >> On 2025-03-25 13:33, Skeeter wrote:
> >>> In article <vrv372$34ao$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
> >>> says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2025-03-25 10:37, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>> In article <vrukht$3kgoj$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
> >>>>> says...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 2025-03-25 08:46, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>> In article <vruiqq$3kg8d$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
> >>>>>>> says...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 2025-03-25 04:10, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> In article <vrt9lq$2br2p$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
> >>>>>>>>> says...
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On 2025-03-24 20:48, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> In article <vrt785$1u3up$15@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> >>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-03-24 20:14, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vrt5mh$1u3up$12@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-03-24 19:47, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vrt1nn$26kf2$1@dont-email.me>,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> super70s@super70s.invalid says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-03-25 00:22:27 +0000, Skeeter said:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vrso3b$1u3up$1@dont-email.me>, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com >
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...like accidentally including a "The Atlantic" reporter on your Signal
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> group chat to discuss your attack plans for Yemen.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How is your trolling working out for you.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's the trolls who are running the current government.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cry baby cry.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dude,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your administration is so incompetent that they included a reporter for
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Atlantic on a top-secret Signal chat about attacking Yemen.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> That has already been debunked. Now go burn something.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> It has?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Show it.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> I already told you. You are just a kick toy. Go look it
> >>>>>>>>>>> up.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> So you have nothing...
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> ...again.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Debunked.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> It absolutely happened.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> But not like they are saying. I'm watching the hearings.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> How do you claim it was different than what I posted?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Because left hand media isnt in my house.
> >>>>
> >>>> Avoiding the question, so let me rephrase:
> >>>>
> >>>> You claim it is "not like they are saying".
> >>>>
> >>>> In what WAY is it different?
> >>>
> >>> No one mentioned anything classified.
> >>
> >> 'At 11:44 a.m., the account labeled ?Pete Hegseth? posted in Signal a
> >> ?TEAM UPDATE.? I will not quote from this update, or from certain other
> >> subsequent texts. The information contained in them, if they had been
> >> read by an adversary of the United States, could conceivably have been
> >> used to harm American military and intelligence personnel, particularly
> >> in the broader Middle East, Central Command?s area of responsibility.
> >> What I will say, in order to illustrate the shocking recklessness of
> >> this Signal conversation, is that the Hegseth post contained operational
> >> details of forthcoming strikes on Yemen, including information about
> >> targets, weapons the U.S. would be deploying, and attack sequencing.'
> >>
> >> Let me emphasize the last bit:
> >>
> >> '...the Hegseth post contained operational details of forthcoming
> >> strikes on Yemen, including information about targets, weapons the U.S.
> >> would be deploying, and attack sequencing.'
> >>
> > I notice there is no source. Why is that?
> 
> Because I wanted to tweak your nose:
> 
> <https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2025/03/trump-administration-accidentally-texted-me-its-war-plans/682151/>

BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!

You're joking right?