Davin News Server

On 2025-03-25 16:10, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <vrvbcn$ap3j$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
> says...
>>
>> On 2025-03-25 15:26, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <vrv902$33t9$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
>>> says...
>>>>
>>>> On 2025-03-25 13:33, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>> In article <vrv372$34ao$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
>>>>> says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2025-03-25 10:37, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <vrukht$3kgoj$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
>>>>>>> says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2025-03-25 08:46, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In article <vruiqq$3kg8d$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
>>>>>>>>> says...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-03-25 04:10, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vrt9lq$2br2p$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
>>>>>>>>>>> says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-03-24 20:48, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vrt785$1u3up$15@dont-email.me>, nuh-
>>>>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-03-24 20:14, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vrt5mh$1u3up$12@dont-email.me>, nuh-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-03-24 19:47, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vrt1nn$26kf2$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> super70s@super70s.invalid says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-03-25 00:22:27 +0000, Skeeter said:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vrso3b$1u3up$1@dont-email.me>, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...like accidentally including a "The Atlantic" reporter on your Signal
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> group chat to discuss your attack plans for Yemen.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How is your trolling working out for you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's the trolls who are running the current government.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cry baby cry.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dude,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your administration is so incompetent that they included a reporter for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Atlantic on a top-secret Signal chat about attacking Yemen.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That has already been debunked. Now go burn something.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It has?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Show it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I already told you. You are just a kick toy. Go look it
>>>>>>>>>>>>> up.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> So you have nothing...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ...again.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Debunked.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It absolutely happened.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> But not like they are saying. I'm watching the hearings.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> How do you claim it was different than what I posted?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Because left hand media isnt in my house.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Avoiding the question, so let me rephrase:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You claim it is "not like they are saying".
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In what WAY is it different?
>>>>>
>>>>> No one mentioned anything classified.
>>>>
>>>> 'At 11:44 a.m., the account labeled ?Pete Hegseth? posted in Signal a
>>>> ?TEAM UPDATE.? I will not quote from this update, or from certain other
>>>> subsequent texts. The information contained in them, if they had been
>>>> read by an adversary of the United States, could conceivably have been
>>>> used to harm American military and intelligence personnel, particularly
>>>> in the broader Middle East, Central Command?s area of responsibility.
>>>> What I will say, in order to illustrate the shocking recklessness of
>>>> this Signal conversation, is that the Hegseth post contained operational
>>>> details of forthcoming strikes on Yemen, including information about
>>>> targets, weapons the U.S. would be deploying, and attack sequencing.'
>>>>
>>>> Let me emphasize the last bit:
>>>>
>>>> '...the Hegseth post contained operational details of forthcoming
>>>> strikes on Yemen, including information about targets, weapons the U.S.
>>>> would be deploying, and attack sequencing.'
>>>>
>>> I notice there is no source. Why is that?
>>
>> Because I wanted to tweak your nose:
>>
>> <https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2025/03/trump-administration-accidentally-texted-me-its-war-plans/682151/>
> 
> BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!
> 
> You're joking right?

What reason does he have to lie?

Moreover, when he testifies about it, they can compare his transcripts 
against the actual mission details.