From: Skeeter <none@none.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.trump,can.politics
Subject: Re: Nothing quite says "incompetence"...
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2025 20:36:23 -0600
Organization: UTB
In article <vrvh8n$g116$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
>
> On 2025-03-25 16:09, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <vrvb84$ap8p$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
> > says...
> >>
> >> On 2025-03-25 15:24, Skeeter wrote:
> >>> In article <vrv8rb$33t9$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
> >>> says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2025-03-25 14:11, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>> In article <vrv3vf$34ao$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
> >>>>> says...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 2025-03-25 13:25, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>> In article <T0CEP.70103$D41.66516@fx45.iad>,
> >>>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 3/25/2025 10:37 AM, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> In article <vrukht$3kgoj$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
> >>>>>>>>> says...
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On 2025-03-25 08:46, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> In article <vruiqq$3kg8d$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
> >>>>>>>>>>> says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-03-25 04:10, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vrt9lq$2br2p$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-03-24 20:48, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vrt785$1u3up$15@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-03-24 20:14, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vrt5mh$1u3up$12@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-03-24 19:47, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vrt1nn$26kf2$1@dont-email.me>,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> super70s@super70s.invalid says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-03-25 00:22:27 +0000, Skeeter said:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vrso3b$1u3up$1@dont-email.me>, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com >
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...like accidentally including a "The Atlantic" reporter on your Signal
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> group chat to discuss your attack plans for Yemen.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How is your trolling working out for you.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's the trolls who are running the current government.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cry baby cry.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dude,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your administration is so incompetent that they included a reporter for
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Atlantic on a top-secret Signal chat about attacking Yemen.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That has already been debunked. Now go burn something.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It has?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Show it.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I already told you. You are just a kick toy. Go look it
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> up.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> So you have nothing...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...again.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Debunked.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> It absolutely happened.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> But not like they are saying. I'm watching the hearings.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> How do you claim it was different than what I posted?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Because left hand media isnt in my house.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> You don't know a fucking thing you claim to know.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> The editor of The Atlantic was added to a group chat on Signal.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> So?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> So the group discussed classified war plans, and the editor of The Atlantic has
> >>>>>>>> no clearance to learn about that.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> No they didn't. This has been settled. It's over.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The White House has acknowledged that it happened.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> But no classified info was shared.
> >>>>
> >>>> Sorry, but you cannot possibly know if that's true or not.
> >>>
> >>> They said so. Until the texts are released you can't prove
> >>> shit. I believe them.
> >>
> >> One person with a very good reason to lie said so.
> >
> > Who? Why? Details. The editor was a known liar.
> >>
> >>>>
> >>>> I suspect that the Atlantic's editor will be testifying about it in
> >>>> closed session.
> >>>
> >>> Why didn't he release his copies? Maybe because he was
> >>> lying about what they said. He's been known to lie before.
> >>
> >> Because if they're classified, he'll be in a lot of trouble.
> >
> > He could release them to congress. He has nothing and we
> > all know it.
> >>
> >>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> The subject of the group chat was the US attacks about to be launched
> >>>>>>>>>> against Yemen and included operational details.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> The attacks have already taken place.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> No, they have not.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Done deal. Bombs dropped.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Nope.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Yes. Dont you have a car to burn?
> >>>> The White House has already acknowledged it happened.
> >>>
> >>> Yes and no classified info was discussed. The bombs got
> >>> dropped 2 hours later.
> >> So you acknowledge what you claimed earlier that the chat was after the
> >> bombs dropped is wrong.
> >
> > Who cares spin boy? The fact is no classified info was
> > discussed.
> >
> >
>
> The fact is you have no way of knowing if that's true.
They said so.