From: Skeeter <none@none.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.trump,can.politics
Subject: Re: Nothing quite says "incompetence"...
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2025 20:38:23 -0600
Organization: UTB
In article <vrvhcf$g116$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
>
> On 2025-03-25 16:11, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <vrvbdh$ap3j$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
> > says...
> >>
> >> On 2025-03-25 15:18, Skeeter wrote:
> >>> In article <vrv8nn$33t9$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
> >>> says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2025-03-25 14:12, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>> In article <vrv41f$34ao$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
> >>>>> says...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 2025-03-25 13:24, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>> In article <B%BEP.70102$D41.43475@fx45.iad>,
> >>>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 3/25/2025 9:10 AM, Alan wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> On 2025-03-25 08:46, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> In article <vruiqq$3kg8d$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
> >>>>>>>>>> says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-03-25 04:10, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vrt9lq$2br2p$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>> says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-03-24 20:48, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vrt785$1u3up$15@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-03-24 20:14, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vrt5mh$1u3up$12@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-03-24 19:47, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vrt1nn$26kf2$1@dont-email.me>,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> super70s@super70s.invalid says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-03-25 00:22:27 +0000, Skeeter said:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vrso3b$1u3up$1@dont-email.me>, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com >
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...like accidentally including a "The Atlantic" reporter on your
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Signal
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> group chat to discuss your attack plans for Yemen.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How is your trolling working out for you.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's the trolls who are running the current government.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cry baby cry.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dude,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your administration is so incompetent that they included a reporter for
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Atlantic on a top-secret Signal chat about attacking Yemen.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That has already been debunked. Now go burn something.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It has?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Show it.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I already told you. You are just a kick toy. Go look it
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> up.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> So you have nothing...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ...again.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Debunked.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> It absolutely happened.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> But not like they are saying. I'm watching the hearings.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> How do you claim it was different than what I posted?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> The editor of The Atlantic was added to a group chat on Signal.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> The subject of the group chat was the US attacks about to be launched against
> >>>>>>>>> Yemen and included operational details.
> >>>>>>>> *Classified* operational details.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell is lying, as always.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Show us these classified texts. Betcha wont.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> He refrained from posting them...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> If they are classified he wont. But they weren't and we
> >>>>> win while you lose.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> ...because he was more careful with classified information than the
> >>>>>> idiots that decided to hold a meeting about attack plans on Signal.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Never happened. Why doesn't the bullshit reporter show
> >>>>> them? Because he doesn't have them.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> The White House has already acknowledged it happened.
> >>>
> >>> But no classified info was discussed.
> >>
> >> Who says that?
> >
> > All of them.
>
> All of whom?
>
> Let's see the quotes.
They said it and I believe it.
>
> >>
> >> Would they have reason to lie about it?
> >
> >
> > Lie about what? No classified info was discussed.
>
> If classified information WAS discussed, then "them" would be in big
> trouble...
No one is in any trouble.
>
> ...right?