Davin News Server

On 2025-03-25 19:36, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <vrvh8n$g116$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
> says...
>>
>> On 2025-03-25 16:09, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <vrvb84$ap8p$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
>>> says...
>>>>
>>>> On 2025-03-25 15:24, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>> In article <vrv8rb$33t9$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
>>>>> says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2025-03-25 14:11, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <vrv3vf$34ao$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
>>>>>>> says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2025-03-25 13:25, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In article <T0CEP.70103$D41.66516@fx45.iad>,
>>>>>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 3/25/2025 10:37 AM, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vrukht$3kgoj$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
>>>>>>>>>>> says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-03-25 08:46, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vruiqq$3kg8d$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>> says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-03-25 04:10, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vrt9lq$2br2p$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-03-24 20:48, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vrt785$1u3up$15@dont-email.me>, nuh-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-03-24 20:14, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vrt5mh$1u3up$12@dont-email.me>, nuh-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-03-24 19:47, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vrt1nn$26kf2$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> super70s@super70s.invalid says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-03-25 00:22:27 +0000, Skeeter said:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vrso3b$1u3up$1@dont-email.me>, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...like accidentally including a "The Atlantic" reporter on your Signal
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> group chat to discuss your attack plans for Yemen.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How is your trolling working out for you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's the trolls who are running the current government.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cry baby cry.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dude,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your administration is so incompetent that they included a reporter for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Atlantic on a top-secret Signal chat about attacking Yemen.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That has already been debunked. Now go burn something.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It has?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Show it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I already told you. You are just a kick toy. Go look it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> up.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So you have nothing...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...again.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Debunked.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It absolutely happened.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> But not like they are saying. I'm watching the hearings.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> How do you claim it was different than what I posted?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Because left hand media isnt in my house.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You don't know a fucking thing you claim to know.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The editor of The Atlantic was added to a group chat on Signal.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> So?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So the group discussed classified war plans, and the editor of The Atlantic has
>>>>>>>>>> no clearance to learn about that.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> No they didn't. This has been settled. It's over.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The White House has acknowledged that it happened.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But no classified info was shared.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sorry, but you cannot possibly know if that's true or not.
>>>>>
>>>>> They said so. Until the texts are released you can't prove
>>>>> shit. I believe them.
>>>>
>>>> One person with a very good reason to lie said so.
>>>
>>> Who? Why? Details. The editor was a known liar.
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I suspect that the Atlantic's editor will be testifying about it in
>>>>>> closed session.
>>>>>
>>>>> Why didn't he release his copies? Maybe because he was
>>>>> lying about what they said. He's been known to lie before.
>>>>
>>>> Because if they're classified, he'll be in a lot of trouble.
>>>
>>> He could release them to congress. He has nothing and we
>>> all know it.
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The subject of the group chat was the US attacks about to be launched
>>>>>>>>>>>> against Yemen and included operational details.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The attacks have already taken place.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> No, they have not.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Done deal. Bombs dropped.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Nope.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes. Dont you have a car to burn?
>>>>>> The White House has already acknowledged it happened.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes and no classified info was discussed. The bombs got
>>>>> dropped 2 hours later.
>>>> So you acknowledge what you claimed earlier that the chat was after the
>>>> bombs dropped is wrong.
>>>
>>> Who cares spin boy? The fact is no classified info was
>>> discussed.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> The fact is you have no way of knowing if that's true.
> 
> They said so.

'Yesterday, we asked officials across the Trump administration if they 
objected to us publishing the full texts. In emails to the Central 
Intelligence Agency, the Office of the Director of National 
Intelligence, the National Security Council, the Department of Defense, 
and the White House, we wrote, in part: “In light of statements today 
from multiple administration officials, including before the Senate 
Intelligence Committee, that the information in the Signal chain about 
the Houthi strike is not classified, and that it does not contain ‘war 
plans,’ The Atlantic is considering publishing the entirety of the 
Signal chain.”

We sent our first request for comment and feedback to national-security 
officials shortly after noon, and followed up in the evening after most 
failed to answer.'


<https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2025/03/signal-group-chat-attack-plans-hegseth-goldberg/682176/#selection-750.0-750.1>

'At 11:44 a.m. eastern time, Hegseth posted in the chat, in all caps, 
“TEAM UPDATE:”

The text beneath this began, “TIME NOW (1144et): Weather is FAVORABLE. 
Just CONFIRMED w/CENTCOM we are a GO for mission launch.” Centcom, or 
Central Command, is the military’s combatant command for the Middle 
East. The Hegseth text continues:

“1215et: F-18s LAUNCH (1st strike package)”
“1345: ‘Trigger Based’ F-18 1st Strike Window Starts (Target Terrorist 
is @ his Known Location so SHOULD BE ON TIME – also, Strike Drones 
Launch (MQ-9s)”
Let us pause here for a moment to underscore a point. This Signal 
message shows that the U.S. secretary of defense texted a group that 
included a phone number unknown to him—Goldberg’s cellphone—at 11:44 
a.m. This was 31 minutes before the first U.S. warplanes launched, and 
two hours and one minute before the beginning of a period in which a 
primary target, the Houthi “Target Terrorist,” was expected to be killed 
by these American aircraft. If this text had been received by someone 
hostile to American interests—or someone merely indiscreet, and with 
access to social media—the Houthis would have had time to prepare for 
what was meant to be a surprise attack on their strongholds. The 
consequences for American pilots could have been catastrophic.'

You did say that if The Atlantic had the goods, they should publish them...

...right?