From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.trump,can.politics
Subject: Re: Nothing quite says "incompetence"...
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 13:26:08 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2025-03-25 19:38, Skeeter wrote:
> In article <vrvhcf$g116$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
> says...
>>
>> On 2025-03-25 16:11, Skeeter wrote:
>>> In article <vrvbdh$ap3j$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
>>> says...
>>>>
>>>> On 2025-03-25 15:18, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>> In article <vrv8nn$33t9$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
>>>>> says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2025-03-25 14:12, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <vrv41f$34ao$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
>>>>>>> says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2025-03-25 13:24, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In article <B%BEP.70102$D41.43475@fx45.iad>,
>>>>>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 3/25/2025 9:10 AM, Alan wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-03-25 08:46, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vruiqq$3kg8d$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
>>>>>>>>>>>> says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-03-25 04:10, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vrt9lq$2br2p$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-03-24 20:48, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vrt785$1u3up$15@dont-email.me>, nuh-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-03-24 20:14, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vrt5mh$1u3up$12@dont-email.me>, nuh-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-03-24 19:47, Skeeter wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vrt1nn$26kf2$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> super70s@super70s.invalid says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-03-25 00:22:27 +0000, Skeeter said:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vrso3b$1u3up$1@dont-email.me>, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...like accidentally including a "The Atlantic" reporter on your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Signal
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> group chat to discuss your attack plans for Yemen.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How is your trolling working out for you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's the trolls who are running the current government.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cry baby cry.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dude,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your administration is so incompetent that they included a reporter for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Atlantic on a top-secret Signal chat about attacking Yemen.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That has already been debunked. Now go burn something.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It has?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Show it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I already told you. You are just a kick toy. Go look it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> up.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So you have nothing...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...again.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Debunked.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> It absolutely happened.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> But not like they are saying. I'm watching the hearings.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> How do you claim it was different than what I posted?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The editor of The Atlantic was added to a group chat on Signal.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The subject of the group chat was the US attacks about to be launched against
>>>>>>>>>>> Yemen and included operational details.
>>>>>>>>>> *Classified* operational details.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell is lying, as always.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Show us these classified texts. Betcha wont.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> He refrained from posting them...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If they are classified he wont. But they weren't and we
>>>>>>> win while you lose.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ...because he was more careful with classified information than the
>>>>>>>> idiots that decided to hold a meeting about attack plans on Signal.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Never happened. Why doesn't the bullshit reporter show
>>>>>>> them? Because he doesn't have them.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The White House has already acknowledged it happened.
>>>>>
>>>>> But no classified info was discussed.
>>>>
>>>> Who says that?
>>>
>>> All of them.
>>
>> All of whom?
>>
>> Let's see the quotes.
>
> They said it and I believe it.
And yet you won't provide the quotes of any of them...
...let alone all.
>>
>>>>
>>>> Would they have reason to lie about it?
>>>
>>>
>>> Lie about what? No classified info was discussed.
>>
>> If classified information WAS discussed, then "them" would be in big
>> trouble...
>
> No one is in any trouble.
But you agree that if they had actually discussed classified information
in an insecure chat, then they would be...
...right?