Davin News Server

In article <vs1nom$2gvru$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com 
says...
> 
> On 2025-03-25 19:36, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <vrvh8n$g116$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
> > says...
> >>
> >> On 2025-03-25 16:09, Skeeter wrote:
> >>> In article <vrvb84$ap8p$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
> >>> says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2025-03-25 15:24, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>> In article <vrv8rb$33t9$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
> >>>>> says...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 2025-03-25 14:11, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>> In article <vrv3vf$34ao$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
> >>>>>>> says...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 2025-03-25 13:25, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> In article <T0CEP.70103$D41.66516@fx45.iad>,
> >>>>>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On 3/25/2025 10:37 AM, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> In article <vrukht$3kgoj$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
> >>>>>>>>>>> says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-03-25 08:46, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vruiqq$3kg8d$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-03-25 04:10, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vrt9lq$2br2p$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-03-24 20:48, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vrt785$1u3up$15@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-03-24 20:14, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vrt5mh$1u3up$12@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-03-24 19:47, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vrt1nn$26kf2$1@dont-email.me>,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> super70s@super70s.invalid says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-03-25 00:22:27 +0000, Skeeter said:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vrso3b$1u3up$1@dont-email.me>, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com >
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...like accidentally including a "The Atlantic" reporter on your Signal
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> group chat to discuss your attack plans for Yemen.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How is your trolling working out for you.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's the trolls who are running the current government.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cry baby cry.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dude,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your administration is so incompetent that they included a reporter for
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Atlantic on a top-secret Signal chat about attacking Yemen.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That has already been debunked. Now go burn something.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It has?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Show it.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I already told you. You are just a kick toy. Go look it
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> up.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So you have nothing...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...again.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Debunked.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It absolutely happened.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> But not like they are saying. I'm watching the hearings.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> How do you claim it was different than what I posted?
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Because left hand media isnt in my house.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> You don't know a fucking thing you claim to know.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> The editor of The Atlantic was added to a group chat on Signal.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> So?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> So the group discussed classified war plans, and the editor of The Atlantic has
> >>>>>>>>>> no clearance to learn about that.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> No they didn't. This has been settled. It's over.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> The White House has acknowledged that it happened.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> But no classified info was shared.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Sorry, but you cannot possibly know if that's true or not.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> They said so. Until the texts are released you can't prove
> >>>>> shit. I believe them.
> >>>>
> >>>> One person with a very good reason to lie said so.
> >>>
> >>> Who? Why? Details. The editor was a known liar.
> >>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I suspect that the Atlantic's editor will be testifying about it in
> >>>>>> closed session.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Why didn't he release his copies? Maybe because he was
> >>>>> lying about what they said. He's been known to lie before.
> >>>>
> >>>> Because if they're classified, he'll be in a lot of trouble.
> >>>
> >>> He could release them to congress. He has nothing and we
> >>> all know it.
> >>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> The subject of the group chat was the US attacks about to be launched
> >>>>>>>>>>>> against Yemen and included operational details.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> The attacks have already taken place.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> No, they have not.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Done deal. Bombs dropped.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Nope.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Yes. Dont you have a car to burn?
> >>>>>> The White House has already acknowledged it happened.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Yes and no classified info was discussed. The bombs got
> >>>>> dropped 2 hours later.
> >>>> So you acknowledge what you claimed earlier that the chat was after the
> >>>> bombs dropped is wrong.
> >>>
> >>> Who cares spin boy? The fact is no classified info was
> >>> discussed.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> The fact is you have no way of knowing if that's true.
> > 
> > They said so.
> 
> 'Yesterday, we asked officials across the Trump administration if they 
> objected to us publishing the full texts. In emails to the Central 
> Intelligence Agency, the Office of the Director of National 
> Intelligence, the National Security Council, the Department of Defense, 
> and the White House, we wrote, in part: ?In light of statements today 
> from multiple administration officials, including before the Senate 
> Intelligence Committee, that the information in the Signal chain about 
> the Houthi strike is not classified, and that it does not contain ?war 
> plans,? The Atlantic is considering publishing the entirety of the 
> Signal chain.?
> 
> We sent our first request for comment and feedback to national-security 
> officials shortly after noon, and followed up in the evening after most 
> failed to answer.'
> 
> 
> <https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2025/03/signal-group-chat-attack-plans-hegseth-goldberg/682176/#selection-750.0-750.1>
> 
> 'At 11:44 a.m. eastern time, Hegseth posted in the chat, in all caps, 
> ?TEAM UPDATE:?
> 
> The text beneath this began, ?TIME NOW (1144et): Weather is FAVORABLE. 
> Just CONFIRMED w/CENTCOM we are a GO for mission launch.? Centcom, or 
> Central Command, is the military?s combatant command for the Middle 
> East. The Hegseth text continues:
> 
> ?1215et: F-18s LAUNCH (1st strike package)?
> ?1345: ?Trigger Based? F-18 1st Strike Window Starts (Target Terrorist 
> is @ his Known Location so SHOULD BE ON TIME ? also, Strike Drones 
> Launch (MQ-9s)?
> Let us pause here for a moment to underscore a point. This Signal 
> message shows that the U.S. secretary of defense texted a group that 
> included a phone number unknown to him?Goldberg?s cellphone?at 11:44 
> a.m. This was 31 minutes before the first U.S. warplanes launched, and 
> two hours and one minute before the beginning of a period in which a 
> primary target, the Houthi ?Target Terrorist,? was expected to be killed 
> by these American aircraft. If this text had been received by someone 
> hostile to American interests?or someone merely indiscreet, and with 
> access to social media?the Houthis would have had time to prepare for 
> what was meant to be a surprise attack on their strongholds. The 
> consequences for American pilots could have been catastrophic.'
> 
> You did say that if The Atlantic had the goods, they should publish them...
> 
> ...right?

Nothing classified there. They wouldn't ave published it 
if there was.