Davin News Server

In article <vs1nq1$2gvru$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com 
says...
> 
> On 2025-03-25 19:37, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <vrvhaj$g116$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
> > says...
> >>
> >> On 2025-03-25 16:10, Skeeter wrote:
> >>> In article <vrvbcn$ap3j$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
> >>> says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2025-03-25 15:26, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>> In article <vrv902$33t9$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
> >>>>> says...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 2025-03-25 13:33, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>> In article <vrv372$34ao$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
> >>>>>>> says...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 2025-03-25 10:37, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> In article <vrukht$3kgoj$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
> >>>>>>>>> says...
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On 2025-03-25 08:46, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> In article <vruiqq$3kg8d$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
> >>>>>>>>>>> says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-03-25 04:10, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vrt9lq$2br2p$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-03-24 20:48, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vrt785$1u3up$15@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-03-24 20:14, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vrt5mh$1u3up$12@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-03-24 19:47, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vrt1nn$26kf2$1@dont-email.me>,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> super70s@super70s.invalid says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-03-25 00:22:27 +0000, Skeeter said:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vrso3b$1u3up$1@dont-email.me>, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com >
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...like accidentally including a "The Atlantic" reporter on your Signal
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> group chat to discuss your attack plans for Yemen.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How is your trolling working out for you.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's the trolls who are running the current government.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cry baby cry.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dude,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your administration is so incompetent that they included a reporter for
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Atlantic on a top-secret Signal chat about attacking Yemen.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That has already been debunked. Now go burn something.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It has?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Show it.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I already told you. You are just a kick toy. Go look it
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> up.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> So you have nothing...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...again.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Debunked.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> It absolutely happened.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> But not like they are saying. I'm watching the hearings.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> How do you claim it was different than what I posted?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Because left hand media isnt in my house.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Avoiding the question, so let me rephrase:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> You claim it is "not like they are saying".
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> In what WAY is it different?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> No one mentioned anything classified.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 'At 11:44 a.m., the account labeled ?Pete Hegseth? posted in Signal a
> >>>>>> ?TEAM UPDATE.? I will not quote from this update, or from certain other
> >>>>>> subsequent texts. The information contained in them, if they had been
> >>>>>> read by an adversary of the United States, could conceivably have been
> >>>>>> used to harm American military and intelligence personnel, particularly
> >>>>>> in the broader Middle East, Central Command?s area of responsibility.
> >>>>>> What I will say, in order to illustrate the shocking recklessness of
> >>>>>> this Signal conversation, is that the Hegseth post contained operational
> >>>>>> details of forthcoming strikes on Yemen, including information about
> >>>>>> targets, weapons the U.S. would be deploying, and attack sequencing.'
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Let me emphasize the last bit:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> '...the Hegseth post contained operational details of forthcoming
> >>>>>> strikes on Yemen, including information about targets, weapons the U.S.
> >>>>>> would be deploying, and attack sequencing.'
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> I notice there is no source. Why is that?
> >>>>
> >>>> Because I wanted to tweak your nose:
> >>>>
> >>>> <https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2025/03/trump-administration-accidentally-texted-me-its-war-plans/682151/>
> >>>
> >>> BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!
> >>>
> >>> You're joking right?
> >>
> >> What reason does he have to lie?
> > 
> > Because he is a known liar.
> 
> Other than you saying so...
> 
> ...what is your proof of that?
> 
> >>
> >> Moreover, when he testifies about it, they can compare his transcripts
> >> against the actual mission details.
> > 
> > Over and done with.
> Indeed:

Yes
> 
> 'At 11:44 a.m. eastern time, Hegseth posted in the chat, in all caps, 
> ?TEAM UPDATE:?

So? No classified info.
> 
> The text beneath this began, ?TIME NOW (1144et): Weather is FAVORABLE. 
> Just CONFIRMED w/CENTCOM we are a GO for mission launch.? Centcom, or 
> Central Command, is the military?s combatant command for the Middle 
> East. The Hegseth text continues:
> 
> ?1215et: F-18s LAUNCH (1st strike package)?
> ?1345: ?Trigger Based? F-18 1st Strike Window Starts (Target Terrorist 
> is @ his Known Location so SHOULD BE ON TIME ? also, Strike Drones 
> Launch (MQ-9s)?
> 
> Let us pause here for a moment to underscore a point. This Signal 
> message shows that the U.S. secretary of defense texted a group that 
> included a phone number unknown to him?Goldberg?s cellphone?at 11:44 
> a.m. This was 31 minutes before the first U.S. warplanes launched, and 
> two hours and one minute before the beginning of a period in which a 
> primary target, the Houthi ?Target Terrorist,? was expected to be killed 
> by these American aircraft. If this text had been received by someone 
> hostile to American interests?or someone merely indiscreet, and with 
> access to social media?the Houthis would have had time to prepare for 
> what was meant to be a surprise attack on their strongholds. The 
> consequences for American pilots could have been catastrophic.'