From: Skeeter <none@none.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.trump,can.politics
Subject: Re: Nothing quite says "incompetence"...
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2025 14:35:02 -0600
Organization: UTB
In article <vs1nt1$2gvru$5@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
>
> On 2025-03-25 19:38, Skeeter wrote:
> > In article <vrvhcf$g116$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
> > says...
> >>
> >> On 2025-03-25 16:11, Skeeter wrote:
> >>> In article <vrvbdh$ap3j$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
> >>> says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2025-03-25 15:18, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>> In article <vrv8nn$33t9$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
> >>>>> says...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 2025-03-25 14:12, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>> In article <vrv41f$34ao$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
> >>>>>>> says...
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 2025-03-25 13:24, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> In article <B%BEP.70102$D41.43475@fx45.iad>,
> >>>>>>>>> mike.am.surreal@earthlink.nut says...
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On 3/25/2025 9:10 AM, Alan wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-03-25 08:46, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vruiqq$3kg8d$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>> says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-03-25 04:10, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vrt9lq$2br2p$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-03-24 20:48, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vrt785$1u3up$15@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-03-24 20:14, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vrt5mh$1u3up$12@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-03-24 19:47, Skeeter wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vrt1nn$26kf2$1@dont-email.me>,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> super70s@super70s.invalid says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-03-25 00:22:27 +0000, Skeeter said:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vrso3b$1u3up$1@dont-email.me>, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com >
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> says...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...like accidentally including a "The Atlantic" reporter on your
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Signal
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> group chat to discuss your attack plans for Yemen.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How is your trolling working out for you.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's the trolls who are running the current government.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cry baby cry.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dude,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your administration is so incompetent that they included a reporter for
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Atlantic on a top-secret Signal chat about attacking Yemen.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That has already been debunked. Now go burn something.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It has?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Show it.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I already told you. You are just a kick toy. Go look it
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> up.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So you have nothing...
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...again.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Debunked.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> It absolutely happened.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> But not like they are saying. I'm watching the hearings.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> How do you claim it was different than what I posted?
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> The editor of The Atlantic was added to a group chat on Signal.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> The subject of the group chat was the US attacks about to be launched against
> >>>>>>>>>>> Yemen and included operational details.
> >>>>>>>>>> *Classified* operational details.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Skeeter-Shit "Lamey" Jack-Off Shit-4-Braincell is lying, as always.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Show us these classified texts. Betcha wont.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> He refrained from posting them...
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> If they are classified he wont. But they weren't and we
> >>>>>>> win while you lose.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> ...because he was more careful with classified information than the
> >>>>>>>> idiots that decided to hold a meeting about attack plans on Signal.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Never happened. Why doesn't the bullshit reporter show
> >>>>>>> them? Because he doesn't have them.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The White House has already acknowledged it happened.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> But no classified info was discussed.
> >>>>
> >>>> Who says that?
> >>>
> >>> All of them.
> >>
> >> All of whom?
> >>
> >> Let's see the quotes.
> >
> > They said it and I believe it.
>
> And yet you won't provide the quotes of any of them...
>
> ...let alone all.
I believe them. That's good enough.
Adios Airlines.
One Way Only
>
> >>
> >>>>
> >>>> Would they have reason to lie about it?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Lie about what? No classified info was discussed.
> >>
> >> If classified information WAS discussed, then "them" would be in big
> >> trouble...
> >
> > No one is in any trouble.
>
> But you agree that if they had actually discussed classified information
> in an insecure chat, then they would be...
>
> ...right?
You are trying to spin what I say again. This is why I
don't take you seriously.