Davin News Server

You fuckers keep providing us comic relief:

Climate change apparently not primarily caused by CO2 and cheap energy.

Climate change is caused by scientific racism and colonialism, conceived with suffering millions at the altar of capital 
accumulation, sparked by Columbus plowing into a paradise island in 1492

Good God, you fuckers are nuts. Is this cunt simply trying to take the onus off of China, now that THEY'RE the ones spewing the 
most pollution? (CO2 makes no difference, and is IN FACT, better for the world than lower levels)


Dark Laboratory: Groundbreaking Book Argues Climate Crisis Was Sparked By Colonization

Tao Leigh Gaffe Argues Climate Breakdown Is The Mutant Offspring of European Scientific Racism And Colonialism

We all think we know what is causing the breakdown of the planet's climate: burning fossil fuels that release carbon dioxide, 
change the chemistry of the air and trap more heat from the sun, leading to rising temperatures.

But Tao Leigh Goffe, an associate professor of Africana, Puerto Rican and Latino Studies at the City University of New York, 
wants us to visualize a far more specific cause: the shunting of a ship's prow on to the sandbank of a paradise island in 1492.

In Dark Laboratory, her groundbreaking new book, Goffe argues that it was the colonization of the Americas by Christopher 
Columbus that set off the chain of events that has led us to where we stand today, on the precipice of global catastrophe.

Climate breakdown, she says, is the mutant offspring of European scientific racism and colonialism, conceived in the suffering 
millions of Africans, Asians and Indigenous Americans endured at the altar of capital accumulation.

[...]

<https://www.theguardian.com/news/2025/mar/28/dark-laboratory-groundbreaking-book-argues-climate-crisis-was-sparked-by-
colonization>

==================================================

Climate Change/Global Warming/CO² Explains EVERYTHING!

Climate Change/Global Warming/CO² makes for shorter winters, except for when it makes for longer winters. 

Climate Change/Global Warming/CO² means less snow, except for when Climate Change/Global Warming/CO² means more snow. 

And Climate Change/Global Warming/CO² causes droughts in California and floods in Texas and Oklahoma and generally makes wet 
places wetter and dry places dryer, except when it makes wet places drier and dry places wetter, except when none of that changes 
at all, and then Climate Change/Global Warming/CO² explains that too! 

And Climate Change/Global Warming/CO² causes more hurricanes at the same time as it causes less hurricanes. 

Climate Change/Global Warming/CO² causes more rain but less water... and less rain but more water?

And Climate Change/Global Warming/CO² causes more water vapour in the atmosphere, at the same time it causes less rain... and 
less water vapour in the atmosphere, when it causes MORE rain? 

Climate Change/Global Warming/CO² decreases the spread of malaria at the same time as it increases the spread of malaria. 

Climate Change/Global Warming/CO² makes San Francisco foggier... Climate Change/Global Warming/CO² makes San Francisco less 
foggy. 

Climate Change/Global Warming/CO² causes duller autumn leaves... Climate Change/Global Warming/CO² causes shinier autumn leaves. 

Climate Change/Global Warming/CO² makes for less salty seas... Climate Change/Global Warming/CO² makes for saltier seas. 

Climate Change/Global Warming/CO² causes the polar ice caps to melt... Climate Change/Global Warming/CO² also causes the polar 
ice caps to freeze. 

Climate Change/Global Warming/CO² makes the Earth hotter, unless the Earth isn't getting hotter... in which case, Climate 
Change/Global Warming/CO² can explain that too. 

What's the problem here? This sounds like the perfect scientific theory. It can explain literally everything including self 
contradictory things. 

This means it's absolutely perfect, doesn't it? 

Well no, not according to Karl Popper and the philosophers of science and within the philosophy of science there's something 
called the demarcation problem... how do you differentiate science from pseudo-science? 

The left won't LET you, and brands you a denierrrrrrr(whining).