Davin News Server

On Mon, 7 Apr 2025 15:21:32 -0700,  Alan says...  

> 
> On 2025-04-07 11:05, AlleyCat wrote:
> > 
> > On Mon, 7 Apr 2025 10:16:47 -0700,  Alan says...
> > 
> >> down 0.56%
> >> 
> >> down 1.21%
> > 
> > So?

> So YOU are the one

Nope.

Find the words, "everything is alright." 

> who presented a very brief uptick this morning as
> "proof" that everything was alright?

I don't remember, and I'm not going back to look. You can. X has a search box, dumbass rich kid.

> Let's put back what you carefully snipped:
> 
> >> The market has quickly reversed, wiping out losses and moving
> >> rapidly into positive territory, presumably on news the EU is 
> >> willing to negotiate zero for zero tariffs with the US.
> 
> But it turns out that the market hasn't "quickly reversed", has it?

Yes, it has. It went down, then it went up. That's reversing.

Again, moron... if your economic hewo Robert Reich says the Stock Market is not the economy, why do you screech and holler about 
it? 

It's going to go up and down. That's what it does. The losses will be made up. I never said ANYTHING about the Dow going up 
"fixing" everything. I posted those pics and figures to prove that that's what the market does.

Still... no where NEAR as bad as the Democrat/Obama/Frank crash of '08/'09.

Whooo... <2%... all the rich folk are going to go broke!

Again, moronic faggoted rich kid... the stock market is NOT a bellwether for the economy. It's volatile. What happened when the 
Dow went down 1000 points?

Alms... alms for the poor?

I'm not saying that when the Dow rebounded, all was well, but by the same token, it didn't hurt the economy either. The media is 
driving the panic. There's no need. Everything will rebound.

This is STILL no where NEAR as bad as the Democrat/Obama REAL crash of '08/'09. (see bottom)

Robert Reich
@RBReich

The richest 0.1% own 17% of stocks
The richest 1% own 50% of stocks
The bottom 50% own 0.7% of stocks
Repeat after me: "The stock market is not the economy."

=====

I thought I and others have already schooled you on the fact that the stock market doesn't always affect the economy like you 
think?

Treating the stock market indexes as general measures of the well-being of a society is like treating your blood pressure as an 
indicator of health.  The higher, the better, right?  In fact, a high stock market is good for the investor class, but it means 
the rest of us are getting screwed better than ever.

The Market does NOT reflect the economy. How many fucking times do you need to be told this.

If Biden Does Not Look At Stock Market To Judge Economy... Why Should YOU!?

===

White House: Biden Does Not Look At Stock Market To Judge Economy

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/white-house-biden-does-not-look-stock-market-
judge-economy-2022-01-24/

United States US Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin released from hospital 9:18 AM 
PST. U.S. President Joe Biden does not look at the stock market as a way to 
judge the strength or weakness of the U.S ...

=====

A Rising STOCK MARKET DOES NOT SIGNAL ECONOMIC HEALTH

https://fee.org/articles/a-rising-stock-market-does-not-signal-economic-health/

The Trump rally is not a sign of economic health, but of what quite likely will 
be harm to all Americans through higher prices, fewer choices, and a reduction 
in entrepreneurial innovation. Profits and rising stock prices in truly free 
markets reflect real value creation and want satisfaction. Profits and rising 
stock prices in a system of ...

=====

Markets Rise As Economy Struggles; 'It Does Not Make Sense'

https://thehill.com/policy/finance/511926-markets-rise-as-economy-struggles-it-
does-not-make-sense/

The expression "STOCK MARKETS ARE NOT THE ECONOMY" may have never been truer. 
The S&P 500, an index that tracks the country's largest publicly traded 
companies, has all but erased its pandemic... 

=====

A RISING STOCK MARKET DOES NOT DRIVE ECONOMIC GROWTH | Mises Wire

https://mises.org/wire/rising-stock-market-does-not-drive-economic-growth

Dec 7, 2023 - The view that the stock market drives economic growth originates 
from the observation that changes in stock prices precede changes in economic 
data. We suggest that various economic indicators are heavily influenced by 
money supply, which also drives stock prices. The price of something is the 
amount of money asked for per unit.


Fucking idiot.

 
===============================================================================

"Trump Derangement Syndrome" Is a Real Mental Condition

All you need to know about "Trump Derangement Syndrome," or TDS.

"Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) is a mental condition in which a person has been driven effectively insane due to their dislike 
of Donald Trump, to the point at which they will abandon all logic and reason."

Justin Raimondo, the editorial director of Antiwar.com, wrote a piece in the Los Angeles Times in 2016 that broke TDS down into 
three distinct phases or stages:

"In the first stage of the disease, victims lose all sense of proportion. The president-elect's every tweet provokes a firestorm, 
as if 140 characters were all it took to change the world."

"The mid-level stages of TDS have a profound effect on the victim's vocabulary: Sufferers speak a distinctive language consisting 
solely of hyperbole."

"As TDS progresses, the afflicted lose the ability to distinguish fantasy from reality."

The Point here is simple: TDS is, in the eyes of its adherents, the knee-jerk opposition from liberals to anything and everything 
Trump does. If Trump announced he was donating every dollar he's ever made, TDS sufferers would suggest he was up to something 
nefarious, according to the logic of TDS. There's nothing - not. one. thing. - that Trump could do or say that would be received 
positively by TDSers.

The history of Trump Derangement Syndrome actually goes back to the early 2000s - a time when the idea of Trump as president was 
a punch line for late-night comics and nothing more.

Wikipedia traces its roots to "Bush Derangement Syndrome" - a term first coined by the late conservative columnist Charles 
Krauthammer back in 2003. The condition, as Krauthammer defined it, was "the acute onset of paranoia in otherwise normal people 
in reaction to the policies, the presidency - nay - the very existence of George W. Bush."