From: AlleyCat <katt@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Rich Boy's Bullshit Liberal Semantics Games NEVER Work
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 13:29:48 -0500
Organization: AlleyCat Computing, Inc.
On Wed, 9 Apr 2025 20:12:41 -0700, Alan says...
> >>> Drug addict Hunter Biden sat in on high-level meetings in the
> >>> White House Biden had his influence-peddling deadbeat son in the
> >>> Oval Office He praised Hunter as the smartest man he knows
> >>> Hunter did NOT have security clearance So kindly shut the FUCK
> >>> up about Signal.
> >>>
> >>> https://x.com/i/status/1909087474451644768
> >>
> >> How would Lindy Li know WHO was sitting in on meetings in the
> >> White House?
> >>
> >> Explain that please.
> >
> > People in her life were able to tell her about it.
>
> Then why haven't they corroborated it?
Then, why hasn't WHO corroborated "it", and why do "they" NEED to?
Who ASKED "them" to?
YOU?
LOL
She's on X... ask HER to corroborate it.
Usually, when someone says something that's true, it doesn't NEED to be "corroborated", unless someone thinks it untrue.
Do YOU think it's untrue?
Yeah yeah yeah... we already know... this is the moment you say, "I didn't say that. I simply asked YOU to explain that."
YOU explain it. YOU look/looked it up and found it to be true, hence this bullshit game.
Fuck off rich boy faggot.
Do your own research.
Refute it... if you can.
If you can't?
Shut the fuck up and quit playing your bullshit faggot games.
:-)
===============================================================================
Liberals Always Get Caught By The Semantic Games They Play
By J.J. Jackson - Bio and Archives - March 31,2012
American Politics, News | CFP Comments | Reader Friendly | Subscribe | Email Us
Semantics is the use language to manipulate the meanings of words in order to achieve a desired effect on an audience. For
example when an angry liberal emails me and says, "someone should put a bullet in your head," I ask if that said liberal thinks
that it would be good if someone killed me and then said liberal emails me back crying about how he, "never said that!" Well,
this is semantics.
Yes, it is indeed true that said angry liberal never uttered the exact words, "I wish someone would kill you," but what else does
someone putting a "bullet in my head" imply? Still, to the liberal mindset, this liberal has never said anything as inflammatory
as wishing me dead.
This is precisely why it is so hard to argue with a liberal. No matter what they say, there is always some
semantic argument that they will make that allows them to claim that they never really said what they said. It is like nailing
Jell-o to the proverbial tree.
The examples of these semantic games played by liberals are numerous. Abortion is not 'murder"
because even though an innocent child is being killed in cold blood, they have come up with another name to call it. Formally
declared wars are not "formally" declared wars because liberals do not like the verbiage that was used to initiate the use of
military force (i.e. war).
According to liberals, certain groups of people are not people (i.e. corporations) and said people are
not entitled to their first amendment rights because liberals refuse to call them people. But on the other hand, labor unions,
groups of people, had better be allowed their first amendment rights and then some or else holy Hell will break loose.
Conservatives are "NAZIs" because, even though Nazism stands for National Socialism and was practiced by the National Socialist
German Workers" Party, the word "socialism" is not uttered when saying the words "NAZI". Therefore NAZI magically comes to mean
"conservative" rather than left-wing, socialist, progressive moonbat.