From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: Rich Boy's Bullshit Liberal Semantics Games NEVER Work
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 15:41:29 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2025-04-10 11:29, AlleyCat wrote:
>
> On Wed, 9 Apr 2025 20:12:41 -0700, Alan says...
>
>>>>> Drug addict Hunter Biden sat in on high-level meetings in
>>>>> the White House Biden had his influence-peddling deadbeat
>>>>> son in the Oval Office He praised Hunter as the smartest man
>>>>> he knows Hunter did NOT have security clearance So kindly
>>>>> shut the FUCK up about Signal.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://x.com/i/status/1909087474451644768
>>>>
>>>> How would Lindy Li know WHO was sitting in on meetings in the
>>>> White House?
>>>>
>>>> Explain that please.
>>>
>>> People in her life were able to tell her about it.
>>
>> Then why haven't they corroborated it?
>
> Then, why hasn't WHO corroborated "it", and why do "they" NEED to?
Hmmmm...
You said:
"People in her life were able to tell her about it"
And I replied with the word "they".
Logic tells most of us that "they" referred to the "people in her life".
>
> Who ASKED "them" to?
>
> YOU?
>
> LOL
>
> She's on X... ask HER to corroborate it.
>
> Usually, when someone says something that's true, it doesn't NEED to
> be "corroborated", unless someone thinks it untrue.
No, actually.
When someone says that something is true, and others aren't convinced,
the claimant is expected to provide corroboration.
>
> Do YOU think it's untrue?
Yup.