From: Skeeter OG <invalid@none.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: Can You Tell Us WHY You Want Illegal Alien Gang Members To Have Due Process And Stay In America?
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2025 14:42:58 -0600
Organization: UTB
In article <1033618142.767038163.174453.recscuba_google-
huntzinger.com@news.eternal-september.org>,
recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
>
> Skeeter OG <invalid@none.com> wrote:
> > In article <1601913815.766801634.333602.recscuba_google-
> > huntzinger.com@news.eternal-september.org>,
> > recscuba_google@huntzinger.com says...
> >>
> >> Skeeter OG <invalid@none.com> wrote:
> >>> In article <vtqbjq$6bga$2@dont-email.me>,
> >>> chine.bleu@yahoo.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On 16/4/25 18:41, pothead wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Did Laken Riley get due process?
> >>>>>>>>>>> She's dead because an illegal migrant killed her.
> >>>>>>>>>>> And there are many others like her.
> >>>>>>>>> She's dead because a PERSON killed her.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> and that person was an illegal immigrant.
> >>>>> Bingo.
> >>>>> And totally preventable.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> That's the point the libbys ignore.
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> So no illegal immigrants then no murders.
> >>>
> >>> Who said that? Oh YOU did.
> >>
> >> Yet it is historically correct.
> >
> > No it isn't. Are all liberals as dumb as you?
>
> It is precisely what you?re trying to imply?and are now trying to play dumb
> when you?ve been called out for it.
I never said that. But there would be a lot less.
>
>
> >>>> The concept of an 'illegal immigrant' is only from the 1920s.
> >>>
> >>> Cross the right way.
> >>
> >> So the ?right? way would be to have a totally fair & impartial system which
> >> doesn?t contain racist, misogynistic, or bigoted exclusions ? right?
> >
> > The right way. What part of that don't you understand?
>
> Dodge attempted.
No dodge. Enter the right way. Why is following the law so
confusing to you libs?
>
> Again: does the ?right? way would be to have a totally fair & impartial
> system which does not contain racist, misogynistic, or bigoted exclusions?
You submit your case and if you pass you may enter.
>
>
> Because what we have today is not ?right? by these metrics. And by you
> trying to dodge acknowledgment of this, you?re effectively admitting that
> our current immigration policy is not right.
>
When was the last time you tried to cross the border? Stop
being dumb. Come to a legal entry point and it will be
determined if you are elegable. Got a crime record. Maybe
not.
>
> >>>> No murders during the nineteenth century. Nobody was shot in the
> >>>> back of their head whilst watching a play.
> >>
> >> Gosh, no snappy retort attempt on this satirical comment, eh?
> >
> > Because it was a stupid statement.
>
> Not stupid at all: you?re merely mad that your attempt to imply/create
> causality from nothing has been called out as logically invalid.
>
>
> -hh