Davin News Server

On 2025-04-22 14:43, Skeeter OG wrote:
> In article <vu920d$1f8fm$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
> says...
>>
>> On 2025-04-22 14:12, Skeeter OG wrote:
>>> In article <vu8vhj$1ctqu$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
>>> says...
>>>>
>>>> On 2025-04-22 13:39, Skeeter OG wrote:
>>>>> In article <vu8s2e$196cb$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
>>>>> says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ' The Food and Drug Administration is suspending a quality control
>>>>>> program for testing of fluid milk and other dairy products due to
>>>>>> reduced capacity in its food safety and nutrition division, according to
>>>>>> an internal email seen by Reuters.'
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/us-fda-suspends-milk-quality-tests-amid-workforce-cuts-2025-04-21/?ref=upstract.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But no problem for you, MAGAts, huh?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 'The suspension is another disruption to the nation's food safety
>>>>>> programs after the termination and departure of 20,000 employees of the
>>>>>> Department of Health and Human Services, which includes the FDA, as part
>>>>>> of President Donald Trump's effort to shrink the federal workforce.'
>>>>>
>>>>> No one had an issue with milk before the regulations.
>>>>
>>>> LOLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!
>>>>
>>>> 'We are living in a time when many see ?deregulation? as a goal in
>>>> itself. Red tape is obnoxious and counterproductive, and government
>>>> should just leave businesses alone. That goes for an expanding array of
>>>> consumer choices. When it comes to food, for example, an odd combination
>>>> of the crunchy left and libertarian right now bridle at laws limiting
>>>> their right to access ?natural? commodities, like raw milk.
>>>>
>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> I only made it to the second page without gagging. There Blum explains
>>>> how milk was often adulterated in the late 19th century. It was watered
>>>> down, and chalk or plaster powder was mixed in to get the color right.
>>>> To replace the layer of cream on top, pureed calf brains could be used.
>>>>
>>>> ...In the case of milk, formaldehyde was a favored option. Commercial
>>>> products such as ?Preservaline? hit the market for precisely this
>>>> purpose. Added to fresh milk, it could prevent curdling for days, the
>>>> same way it could preserve dead bodies. Sadly, it didn?t have quite the
>>>> positive effect on the living children who consumed it. Clusters of
>>>> child deaths in various cities in the late 1890s turned public attention
>>>> to what was being put into milk. Blum suggests dozens of children died,
>>>> particularly those in orphanages and hospitals, which bought the
>>>> cheapest supplies.
>>>>
>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> For milk, a solution existed: pasteurization. It was already mandatory
>>>> in some countries, but U.S. producers resisted on the grounds of cost
>>>> and hassle. No, it would not allow old milk to stay shelf stable for
>>>> weeks without refrigeration (something some of the dairy firms were
>>>> obviously seeking when they used formaldehyde). But it would save
>>>> consumers from the risks of salmonella, listeria, campylobacter (then
>>>> known as ?infant cholera?)?not to mention formaldehyde itself.'
>>>
>>> Did I make you grep all that? The fact is there are to
>>> many regulations. Do you really think with our technology
>>> that they wont keep making good milk? Moron.
>>
>> "grep" it? No.
>>
>> Look it up in order to show you how stupid you are? Sure!
>>
>> Do you really think that companies can be trusted to act in the best
>> interest of safety when they can make more money by doing otherwise?
> 
> They still have to have a product people will buy.

And that was true before safety regulations...

...but they clearly adulterated products then.