From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: AMERICAN Citizens Afforded Less "Due Process" Than ILLEGAL Gang
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2025 20:55:29 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2025-04-23 20:23, AlleyCat wrote:
>
> On Mon, 21 Apr 2025 18:50:13 -0700, Alan says...
>
>>> Many of the January 6 prisoners did not have due process for
>>> years and were American citizens, yet nobody in the media spoke
>>> for them. They allowed it to happen.
>
>> Give ONE example of such a Jan 6 prisoner...
>>
>> ...and I bet I can show you all the court appearances, etc.
>
> Are "court appearances" all there is to the proceedings?
>
> No.
>
> Many were held without bail... detained for whatever reason.
Did a judge make that decision?
Then they got due process with regard to bail.
>
> Pre-Trial Detention vs. Lack of Charges: It's crucial to distinguish
> between being formally "charged" with a crime and being held in "pre-
> trial detention" (sometimes referred to as being held "WITHOUT BAIL"
> OR "ON NO BOND"). While many individuals arrested in connection with
> January 6th were released on bail pending their trials, A
> SIGNIFICANT NUMBER WERE ORDERED TO BE DETAINED. These decisions for
> pre-trial detention are made by judges based on specific legal
> criteria (yeah... being left-wing OBAMA judges and the prisoners
> being Trump supporters), such as the perceived risk of the
> individual fleeing, the potential danger they might pose to the
> community, and the severity of the charges against them. This
> detention is not the same as being held without any charges being
> filed.
>
> No matter the "reasoning", some WERE held without the chance to post
> bond. That is our point.
Name one.
Just ONE.