From: Skeeter OG <invalid@none.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: Poor Rudy... Still Falling For Fake News
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2025 11:50:36 -0600
Organization: UTB
In article <vudric$1vu9u$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
>
> On 2025-04-23 20:23, AlleyCat wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 11:45:04 -0700, Alan says...
> >
> >>>> The reports
> >>>
> >>> No.
> >>>
> >>> They were hearsay.
> >
> >> The "report" that claimed that Abrego Garcia was double hearsay
> >
> > From two JUDGES, not anonymous sources.
> Nope. The reports were presented TO judges.
>
> Judges don't issue reports in cases like this: they make RULINGS.
>
> Those rulings are based on testimony and evidence presented, and hearsay
> is typically not allowed.
ell it was allowed so I guess it wasn't "hearsay".
>
> You really don't understand how the judicial process works, do you?
Like the judge that had gang members living with him?