Davin News Server

From: doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor)
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: I Love It When People Attack Trump And Call Him Stupid
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2025 00:53:22 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: NetKnow News

In article <MPG.42744db5e84454298bbf9@news.eternal-september.org>,
AlleyCat  <katt@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 17:04:39 +0000,  Lee says...  
>
>> 
>> John Smyth wrote:
>> 
>> > An oldie but a goody!
>> > Source anonymous.
>> > 
>> > 
>> > "I love when people call Trump Stupid..
>> > 
>> > 
>> > You mean the guy with the super model wife?
>> 
>> 
>>     And a porno past to prove it. 
>
>Whoo hoo!
>
>Hell yeah!
>
>Jealous, much, faggot?
> 
> > 
>> > You mean the guy whose words alone put a massive slow down on illegal
>> > border crossings?
>> > 
>> 
>>    Crashing the US economy does that,
>> Same thing happened in the Bush Recession.
>
>You mean DEMOCRAT crash. Bush tried to stop what had been in motion for
>a long time.
>
>(see bottom)
> 
>> 
>> 
>> > You mean the guy whose mere presence made the stock market smash its
>> > previous records?
>> 
>> 
>>     BILLIONS lost from the stock market. 
>
>Billions regained. You only lose if you sell.
> 
>
>>     Another Repubilcan recession.
>
>We aren't in a recession.
>
>Were we in a recession when Biden and Co. caused near double-digit
>inflation and near doubled gas prices and grocery prices so 
>high, many people went hungry?
> 
>> 
>> > Are you sure you don't see anything wrong with someone who has a 40 yr
>> > career as a public servant living in a $4.5 mansion representing a
>> > district she doesn't even live in?
>> 
>>  
>>      Like Republican Dr Oz running for 
>> Senator in Pennsylvania while living
>> in New Jersey?
>
>Jesus Christ, faggot. What fucking planet did yu get your liberal logic from?
> 
>> > Are you sure you see nothing wrong or peculiar about Hillary Clinton a
>> > woman being involved in politics for the last 30 yrs having a net worth
>> > of $240 million?
>> 
>> 
>> Not a convicted felon.
>
>Protected by threat of death.
>
>> No adultery.
>
>LOL... WHO would fuck her? Certainly not anyone with eyes. Her husband
>wouldn't even fuck her. HE had to do the "adultering".
>
>> No divorces.
>
>Why give up half your shit to HER?
>
>> Regularly released tax returns.
>
>So?
>
>> Not born a millionaire.
>
>But she stole enough money from her foundation, to become one.
>
>> Not a porn star.
>
>Trump's a porn star?
>
>> Not an immigrant.
>
>We're ALL immigrants.
> 
>============================================================================
>
>Democrat Bahney Fwank's $10 Trillion Crash
>
>That's right, shut-in.
>
>Fwank's Fingerprints Are All Over The Financial Fiasco
>
>https://duckduckgo.com/?q=boston.com+barney+frank+fingerprints&ia=web
>
>************************************************
>
>Key Democrats opposed the Federal Housing Enterprise Regulatory Reform Act 
>of 2005, which would have established a single, independent regulatory 
>body with jursdiction over Fannie and Freddie - a move that the 
>Government Accountability Office had recommended in a 2004 report. 
>
>************************************************
>
>Barney Frank And Democrat Party Most Responsible For 2008 Economic 
>Collapse
>
>It's beyond asinine that Democrats blame Bush for ruining the economy, and 
>praise Clinton as having the mostest wonderfulest economy ever, when it 
>was a Clinton program that ruined the Bush economy.  But that's the 
>mainstream media narrative for you.
>
>************************************************
>
>'THE PRIVATE SECTOR got us into this mess. The government has to get us 
>out of it."
>
>That's Barney Frank's story, and he's sticking to it. As the Massachusetts 
>Democrat has explained it in recent days, the current financial crisis is 
>the spawn of the free market run amok, with the political class guilty 
>only of failing to rein the capitalists in.
>
>The Wall Street meltdown was caused by "bad decisions that were made by 
>people in the private sector," Frank said; the country is in dire straits 
>today "thanks to a conservative philosophy that says the market knows 
>best." And that philosophy goes "back to Ronald Reagan, when at his 
>inauguration he said, 'Government is not the answer to our problems; 
>government is the problem.' "
>
>In fact, that isn't what Reagan said. His actual words were: "In this 
>present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government 
>is the problem." Were he president today, he would be saying much the same 
>thing.
>
>Because while the mortgage crisis convulsing Wall Street has its share of 
>private-sector culprits -- many of whom have been learning lately just how 
>pitiless the private sector's discipline can be -- they weren't the ones 
>who "got us into this mess." Barney Frank's talking points 
>notwithstanding, mortgage lenders didn't wake up one fine day deciding to 
>junk long-held standards of creditworthiness in order to make ill-advised 
>loans to unqualified borrowers. It would be closer to the truth to say 
>they woke up to find the government twisting their arms and demanding that 
>they do so - or else.
>
>The roots of this crisis go back to the Carter administration. That was 
>when government officials, egged on by left-wing activists, began accusing 
>mortgage lenders of racism and "redlining" because urban blacks were being 
>denied mortgages at a higher rate than suburban whites.
>
>************************************************
>
>Only people can who understand how politics and the economy work know 
>this.
>
>Whose Fault was It?
>
>By far the most dangerous myth is that deregulation is the root cause of 
>the problem.
>
>The culprit was a system geared toward loaning money to people who were 
>not in a position to pay it back. Two policies underpinned that system: 
>easy money by the Federal Reserve and the government-induced lowering of 
>standards for approving loan requests.
>
>In a recent paper for the Independent Institute, University of Texas 
>professor Stan Liebowitz argues that "in an attempt to increase 
>homeownership... virtually every branch of the government undertook an 
>attack on underwriting standards starting in the early 1990s... the 
>Clinton era."
>
>Starting with the creation of the Federal Housing Administration in 1934 
>and all the way to the norms that made Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae acquire 
>substantial loans given to people with weak credit. 
>
>Not surprisingly, once the Fed expanded credit, astronomical amounts of 
>capital poured into a housing market that people assumed was protected by 
>the government. What came next was a consequence of the original sin.
>
>Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae, H.U.D., Bahney Fwank, Bill Clinton, Andrew Cuomo.
>
>Who is responsible for the crash?
>
>Democrats' lobbyist-induced denial to regulate Housing, led to Wall Street 
>collapse:
>
>Barney Frank: I don't see anything in this report that raises safety 
>and soundness problems.
>
>"These two entities -- Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac -- are not facing 
>any kind of financial crisis," said Representative Barney Frank of
>Massachusetts, the ranking Democrat on the Financial Services 
>Committee.
>
>"The more people exaggerate these problems, the more pressure there 
>is on these companies, the less we will see in terms of affordable 
>housing."
>
>************************************************
>
>Anatomy of a bubble
>
>Step 1. The intoxication: "My house is worth millions!" From 1995 - 
>2005, the number of sub-prime mortgages skyrocket. So did the house 
>prices.
>
>Step 2. The hangover: "Oh my God, my house isn't selling. What went 
>wrong?"
>
>WHY DIDN'T SOMEONE TRY TO STOP IT?
>
>Someone did:
>
>********* "The Bush administration today recommended the most 
>significant regulatory overhaul in the housing finance industry since 
>the savings and loan crisis a decade ago." - The New York Times, 
>September 11, 2003.  ***************
>
>But someone intervened to stymie the Bush administration. Who? The 
>New York Times reports:
>
>Supporters of the companies said efforts to regulate the lenders 
>tightly under those agencies might diminish their ability to finance loans 
>for lower-income families. . . . "These two entities - Fannie Mae and 
>Freddie Mac - are not facing any kind of financial crisis," said 
>Representative Barney Frank of Massachusetts, the ranking Democrat on 
>the Financial Services Committee. "The more people exaggerate these 
>problems, the more pressure there is on these companies, the less we 
>will see in terms of affordable housing."
>
>"The Bush administration today recommended the most significant 
>regulatory overhaul in the housing finance industry since the savings 
>and loan crisis a decade ago."
>
>"Under the plan, disclosed at a Congressional hearing today, a new 
>agency would be created within the Treasury Department to assume 
>supervision of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the government-sponsored 
>companies that are the two largest players in the mortgage lending 
>industry."
>
>http://tinyurl.com/6lp5qu
>
>"McCain Letter Demanded 2006 Action on Fannie and Freddie"
>
>"Sen. John McCain's 2006 demand for regulatory action on Fannie Mae 
>and Freddie Mac could have prevented current financial crisis, as HUMAN 
>EVENTS learned."
>

What does this have to do with Canadian Politics?

-- 
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
Canada -Save the Nation from Donald Trump - Vote Liberal!