From: 51st State <beyond@hope.com>
Subject: Ontario must pay for surgery to give trans resident both penis and
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2025 11:26:58 +0200 (CEST)
Newsgroups: can.politics, comp.os.linux.advocacy, or.politics, sac.politics,
Organization: dizum.com - The Internet Problem Provider
The Court of Appeal says OHIP must cover surgery for a resident seeking to
have a vagina constructed while leaving penis intact
Ontario's top court has ruled the province must cover the cost of an out-
of-country, penis-sparing vaginoplasty for a 'transgender and non-binary
resident' who wishes to have both female and male genitalia.
In a unanimous decision released this week, a three-judge panel of the
Ontario Court of Appeal confirmed a lower court's ruling ordering the
Ontario Health Insurance Plan to pay for the patient, identified as K.S.
in court records, to undergo the novel phallus-sparing surgery at a Texas
clinic.
The latest ruling is the third unanimous decision in K.S.'s favour.
'K.S. is pleased with the Court of Appeal's decision, which is now the
third unanimous ruling confirming that her gender affirming surgery is
covered under Ontario's Health Insurance Act and its regulation,' K.S.'s
lawyer, John McIntyre, said in an email to National Post.
The legal battle between K.S., whose sex at birth was male, dates to 2022,
when the Ontario Health Insurance Plan (OHIP) refused a funding request
for surgery to construct a vagina while sparing the penis, a procedure
this is not available in Ontario, or anywhere else in Canada.
OHIP argued that, because the vaginoplasty would not be accompanied by a
penectomy, the procedure isn't one specifically listed in OHIP's Schedule
of Benefits and therefore shouldn't be publicly funded. OHIP also argued
that the requested surgery is considered experimental in Ontario and,
thus, also ineligible for coverage.
K.S. appealed to the Health Services Appeal and Review Board, which
overturned OHIP's refusal, arguing that 'vaginoplasty' should be covered,
whether a penectomy, a separate procedure included on the list of publicly
funded sex-reassignment surgeries, is performed or not.
OHIP appealed that decision to the Divisional Court but lost again after
the panel dismissed the province's appeal and declared the surgery, which
leaves intact a functioning penis, an insured service.
The province's latest appeal was heard on Nov. 26. The three-judge appeal
court panel rejected OHIP's arguments that the proposed surgery isn't an
insured service because it won't be accompanied by removal of the penis '
a penectomy 'neither recommended by K.S.'s health professionals nor
desired by K.S.,' according to the court's written decision.
K.S., who is in her early 30s, 'has experienced significant gender
dysphoria since her teenage years, as well as physical, mental and
economic hardships to transition her gender expression to align with her
gender identity,' the court said.
K.S.'s doctor submitted a request to OHIP for prior funding approval for
the surgical creation of a vaginal cavity and external vulva. The request
made it clear that K.S. wasn't seeking a penectomy.
In a letter accompanying the request, her doctor said that because K.S. is
'not completely on the 'feminine' end of the spectrum' it was important
for her to have a vagina while maintaining her penis, adding that the
Crane Center for Transgender Surgery in Austin, Tx.,'has an excellent
reputation' for gender-affirming surgery, 'and especially with these more
complicated procedures.'
The appeal court ruled that the divisional court did not err in holding
that the requested vaginoplasty is listed in the Schedule of Benefits,
with or without an accompanying penectomy.
'The existence of different techniques to perform a vaginoplasty does not
affect this conclusion,' the appeal court's written decision reads. 'It
was open to the drafters of the Schedule of Benefits to describe each
specifically listed service in broad or narrow terms.
'Here the description chosen, vaginoplasty,' is broad enough to encompass
different techniques,' the court said.
'As the (Health Services Appeal and Review) Board put it, a vaginoplasty
without a penectomy is an insured service because it is still a
vaginoplasty, a specifically listed service.'
The World Professional Association for Transgender Health's standards of
care, the appeal court added, also 'expressly refers to 'penile preserving
vaginoplasty' as a surgical option for some non-binary people and also
note that vaginoplasty 'may include retention of penis and/or testicle.''
Ontario has until June 23, 2025, to seek leave to the Supreme Court of
Canada.
'As this matter is within the appeal period, it would be inappropriate to
comment further,h said a spokesperson for Ontario's Ministry of the
Attorney General.
In dismissing OHIP's appeal, the court ordered Ontario to pay K.S. $23,250
in costs.
Gender-affirming surgeries at the Texas clinic range from US$10,000 to
$70,000, depending on the procedures performed.
https://nationalpost.com/news/canada/ohip-coverage-penis-sparing-
vaginoplasty