Davin News Server

In article <vuevpq$34ggc$1@dont-email.me>, Alan  <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>On 2025-04-24 07:21, Skeeter OG wrote:
>> In article <vuc5cu$cuvp$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
>> says...
>>>
>>> On 2025-04-23 18:30, pothead wrote:
>>>> On 2025-04-22, Skeeter OG <invalid@none.com> wrote:
>>>>> In article <vu93nt$1gtg2$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
>>>>> says...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2025-04-22 14:43, Skeeter OG wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <vu920d$1f8fm$4@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
>>>>>>> says...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2025-04-22 14:12, Skeeter OG wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In article <vu8vhj$1ctqu$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
>>>>>>>>> says...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 2025-04-22 13:39, Skeeter OG wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> In article <vu8s2e$196cb$3@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
>>>>>>>>>>> says...
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ' The Food and Drug Administration is suspending a quality control
>>>>>>>>>>>> program for testing of fluid milk and other dairy products due to
>>>>>>>>>>>> reduced capacity in its food safety and nutrition division,
>according to
>>>>>>>>>>>> an internal email seen by Reuters.'
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
><https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/us-fda-suspends-milk-quality-tests-amid-workforce-cuts-2025-04-21/?ref=upstract.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> But no problem for you, MAGAts, huh?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 'The suspension is another disruption to the nation's food safety
>>>>>>>>>>>> programs after the termination and departure of 20,000
>employees of the
>>>>>>>>>>>> Department of Health and Human Services, which includes the
>FDA, as part
>>>>>>>>>>>> of President Donald Trump's effort to shrink the federal workforce.'
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> No one had an issue with milk before the regulations.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> LOLLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 'We are living in a time when many see ?deregulation? as a goal in
>>>>>>>>>> itself. Red tape is obnoxious and counterproductive, and government
>>>>>>>>>> should just leave businesses alone. That goes for an expanding
>array of
>>>>>>>>>> consumer choices. When it comes to food, for example, an odd
>combination
>>>>>>>>>> of the crunchy left and libertarian right now bridle at laws limiting
>>>>>>>>>> their right to access ?natural? commodities, like raw milk.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I only made it to the second page without gagging. There Blum explains
>>>>>>>>>> how milk was often adulterated in the late 19th century. It
>was watered
>>>>>>>>>> down, and chalk or plaster powder was mixed in to get the color right.
>>>>>>>>>> To replace the layer of cream on top, pureed calf brains could
>be used.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ...In the case of milk, formaldehyde was a favored option. Commercial
>>>>>>>>>> products such as ?Preservaline? hit the market for precisely this
>>>>>>>>>> purpose. Added to fresh milk, it could prevent curdling for days, the
>>>>>>>>>> same way it could preserve dead bodies. Sadly, it didn?t have
>quite the
>>>>>>>>>> positive effect on the living children who consumed it. Clusters of
>>>>>>>>>> child deaths in various cities in the late 1890s turned public
>attention
>>>>>>>>>> to what was being put into milk. Blum suggests dozens of
>children died,
>>>>>>>>>> particularly those in orphanages and hospitals, which bought the
>>>>>>>>>> cheapest supplies.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> For milk, a solution existed: pasteurization. It was already mandatory
>>>>>>>>>> in some countries, but U.S. producers resisted on the grounds of cost
>>>>>>>>>> and hassle. No, it would not allow old milk to stay shelf stable for
>>>>>>>>>> weeks without refrigeration (something some of the dairy firms were
>>>>>>>>>> obviously seeking when they used formaldehyde). But it would save
>>>>>>>>>> consumers from the risks of salmonella, listeria, campylobacter (then
>>>>>>>>>> known as ?infant cholera?)?not to mention formaldehyde itself.'
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Did I make you grep all that? The fact is there are to
>>>>>>>>> many regulations. Do you really think with our technology
>>>>>>>>> that they wont keep making good milk? Moron.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "grep" it? No.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Look it up in order to show you how stupid you are? Sure!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Do you really think that companies can be trusted to act in the best
>>>>>>>> interest of safety when they can make more money by doing otherwise?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> They still have to have a product people will buy.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And that was true before safety regulations...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ...but they clearly adulterated products then.
>>>>>
>>>>> It's a new age. Relax.
>>>>
>>>> And look at the various food processing plants that get inspected regularly
>>>> yet still have appalling conditions. So something is not working.
>>>
>>> So you think not inspecting them will make it better?
>> 
>> Who said that? Oh YOU did.
>
>That was your implication.

What does this have to do with Canadian politics?

-- 
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
Canada -Save the Nation from Donald Trump - Vote Liberal!