From: Skeeter OG <invalid@none.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: AMERICAN Citizens Afforded Less "Due Process" Than ILLEGAL Gang Member
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2025 09:21:20 -0600
Organization: UTB
In article <vuef8p$2ikkt$1@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
says...
>
> On 2025-04-24 11:21, Skeeter OG wrote:
> > In article <vudurv$23vjv$2@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
> > says...
> >>
> >> On 2025-04-24 10:37, Skeeter OG wrote:
> >>> In article <vudru3$1vtst$12@dont-email.me>, nuh-
> >>> uh@nope.com says...
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2025-04-24 07:15, Skeeter OG wrote:
> >>>>> In article <vuccjh$nned$6@dont-email.me>, nuh-uh@nope.com
> >>>>> says...
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 2025-04-23 20:31, AlleyCat wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Wed, 23 Apr 2025 18:57:00 -0700, Alan says...
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> And yet you rarely provide sources at all.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> That doesn't mean they aren't credible.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Sources that aren't provided aren't credible.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Yes, the statements are, unless you can refute them, which you RARELY do.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> So the statements by Hegseth's subordinates are credible then?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Are they news?
> >>>>
> >>>> They certainly are.
> >>>
> >>> What news network do they work for?
> >>
> >> The STATEMENTS by Hegseth's subordinates are NEWS.
> >
> > So what news network they work for?
>
> Do you understand that "STATEMENTS" aren't PERSONS?
Who made the statements and what news network do they work
for?