From: Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: can.politics,comp.os.linux.advocacy,or.politics,sac.politics,talk.politics.guns,seattle.politics
Subject: Re: Ontario must pay for surgery to give trans resident both penis and vagina: appeal court
Organization: Newshosting.com - Highest quality at a great price! www.newshosting.com
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2025 16:06:47 -0400
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
>In article <8fcq0k5c7bs7uvje0fnqqrpfud9ba079ag@4ax.com>,
>Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>>pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>>>On 2025-04-25, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> slothe <slothe@netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>On 25 Apr 2025, a425couple <a425couple@hotmail.com> posted some
>>>>>news:qiOOP.2639593$OrR5.2009332@fx18.iad:
>>>>
>>>>>> Simply amazing!
>>>>>> I want it all!
>>>>>> I want it both ways!
>>>>>> And I want all of you to pay for it!
>>>>>> ---------- Court - OK, sounds fine to us.
>>>>>
>>>>>That's ridiculous.
>>>>
>>>> They may have accidentally done the right thing. This particular
>>>> surgery is just fucking insane but it seems to be the wish of the
>>>> person acquiring it - I could never advise anyone to modify their
>>>> genitals but if they choose that they choose with free will to pretend
>>>> that God screwed up and it requires a knife to the balls.
>>>
>>>Looks like the insult "go fu%k yourself" has taken on a whole new meaning.
>>>
>>>ROTFLMAO!
>>
>>They would need a partner, not being able to use the penis to
>>penetrate their own makeshift vagina. I say if a person is delusional
>>enough to think they're bigender and should literally have surgery to
>>have both parts, let them.
>
>What does this have to do with Canadian Politics?
Are there not trans people in Canada, as it happens?
--
Joel W. Crump
Amendment XIV
Section 1.
[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.
Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.