From: doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor)
Newsgroups: can.politics,comp.os.linux.advocacy,or.politics,sac.politics,talk.politics.guns,seattle.politics
Subject: Re: Ontario must pay for surgery to give trans resident both penis and vagina: appeal court
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2025 20:14:57 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: NetKnow News
In article <25fq0k1jlvubo35m4lah3dmmagibvco3c2@4ax.com>,
Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
>>In article <8fcq0k5c7bs7uvje0fnqqrpfud9ba079ag@4ax.com>,
>>Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>>>>On 2025-04-25, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> slothe <slothe@netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>>On 25 Apr 2025, a425couple <a425couple@hotmail.com> posted some
>>>>>>news:qiOOP.2639593$OrR5.2009332@fx18.iad:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Simply amazing!
>>>>>>> I want it all!
>>>>>>> I want it both ways!
>>>>>>> And I want all of you to pay for it!
>>>>>>> ---------- Court - OK, sounds fine to us.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>That's ridiculous.
>>>>>
>>>>> They may have accidentally done the right thing. This particular
>>>>> surgery is just fucking insane but it seems to be the wish of the
>>>>> person acquiring it - I could never advise anyone to modify their
>>>>> genitals but if they choose that they choose with free will to pretend
>>>>> that God screwed up and it requires a knife to the balls.
>>>>
>>>>Looks like the insult "go fu%k yourself" has taken on a whole new meaning.
>>>>
>>>>ROTFLMAO!
>>>
>>>They would need a partner, not being able to use the penis to
>>>penetrate their own makeshift vagina. I say if a person is delusional
>>>enough to think they're bigender and should literally have surgery to
>>>have both parts, let them.
>>
>>What does this have to do with Canadian Politics?
>
>
>Are there not trans people in Canada, as it happens?
>
>--
>Joel W. Crump
>
>Amendment XIV
>Section 1.
>
>[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
>abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
>United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
>life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
>nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
>protection of the laws.
>
>Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
>liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
And US laws have no implication in Canada.
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
Canada -Save the Nation from Donald Trump - Vote Liberal!