From: Tyler Coop <tcoop@uraniumone.com>
Newsgroups: can.politics,comp.os.linux.advocacy,or.politics,sac.politics,talk.politics.guns,seattle.politics
Subject: Re: Ontario must pay for surgery to give trans resident both penis and vagina: appeal court
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2025 20:24:39 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: Victor Usenet Postings
On 26 Apr 2025, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) posted some
news:vujes1$1d9n$2@gallifrey.nk.ca:
> In article <25fq0k1jlvubo35m4lah3dmmagibvco3c2@4ax.com>,
> Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>>doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
>>>In article <8fcq0k5c7bs7uvje0fnqqrpfud9ba079ag@4ax.com>,
>>>Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>>>>>On 2025-04-25, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> slothe <slothe@netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>On 25 Apr 2025, a425couple <a425couple@hotmail.com> posted some
>>>>>>>news:qiOOP.2639593$OrR5.2009332@fx18.iad:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Simply amazing!
>>>>>>>> I want it all!
>>>>>>>> I want it both ways!
>>>>>>>> And I want all of you to pay for it!
>>>>>>>> ---------- Court - OK, sounds fine to us.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>That's ridiculous.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> They may have accidentally done the right thing. This particular
>>>>>> surgery is just fucking insane but it seems to be the wish of the
>>>>>> person acquiring it - I could never advise anyone to modify their
>>>>>> genitals but if they choose that they choose with free will to
>>>>>> pretend that God screwed up and it requires a knife to the balls.
>>>>>
>>>>>Looks like the insult "go fu%k yourself" has taken on a whole new
>>>>>meaning.
>>>>>
>>>>>ROTFLMAO!
>>>>
>>>>They would need a partner, not being able to use the penis to
>>>>penetrate their own makeshift vagina. I say if a person is
>>>>delusional enough to think they're bigender and should literally
>>>>have surgery to have both parts, let them.
>>>
>>>What does this have to do with Canadian Politics?
>>
>>
>>Are there not trans people in Canada, as it happens?
>>
>>--
>>Joel W. Crump
>>
>>Amendment XIV
>>Section 1.
>>
>>[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
>>abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
>>United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
>>life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
>>nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
>>protection of the laws.
>>
>>Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
>>liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
>
> And US laws have no implication in Canada.
It would be a better 51st candidate state if they did!
You moose-kissers get a free pass for Marie-Pierre Bouchard
because she's funny and looks good in a swimsuit.