Subject: Re: Ontario must pay for surgery to give trans resident both penis and vagina: appeal court
Newsgroups: can.politics,comp.os.linux.advocacy,or.politics,sac.politics,talk.politics.guns,seattle.politics
From: Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net>
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2025 03:54:24 -0400
Organization: theCubeNet - www.thecubenet.com
The Binky Doctor wrote:
> In article <a90b43efb9.1745699073@wpghu.xg>,
> Tyler Coop <tcoop@uraniumone.com> wrote:
>> On 26 Apr 2025, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) posted some
>> news:vujes1$1d9n$2@gallifrey.nk.ca:
>>
>>> In article <25fq0k1jlvubo35m4lah3dmmagibvco3c2@4ax.com>,
>>> Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
>>>>> In article <8fcq0k5c7bs7uvje0fnqqrpfud9ba079ag@4ax.com>,
>>>>> Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2025-04-25, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> slothe <slothe@netcom.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 25 Apr 2025, a425couple <a425couple@hotmail.com> posted some
>>>>>>>>> news:qiOOP.2639593$OrR5.2009332@fx18.iad:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Simply amazing!
>>>>>>>>>> I want it all!
>>>>>>>>>> I want it both ways!
>>>>>>>>>> And I want all of you to pay for it!
>>>>>>>>>> ---------- Court - OK, sounds fine to us.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> That's ridiculous.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> They may have accidentally done the right thing. This particular
>>>>>>>> surgery is just fucking insane but it seems to be the wish of the
>>>>>>>> person acquiring it - I could never advise anyone to modify their
>>>>>>>> genitals but if they choose that they choose with free will to
>>>>>>>> pretend that God screwed up and it requires a knife to the balls.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Looks like the insult "go fu%k yourself" has taken on a whole new
>>>>>>> meaning.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ROTFLMAO!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> They would need a partner, not being able to use the penis to
>>>>>> penetrate their own makeshift vagina. I say if a person is
>>>>>> delusional enough to think they're bigender and should literally
>>>>>> have surgery to have both parts, let them.
>>>>>
>>>>> What does this have to do with Canadian Politics?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Are there not trans people in Canada, as it happens?
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Joel W. Crump
>>>>
>>>> Amendment XIV
>>>> Section 1.
>>>>
>>>> [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
>>>> abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
>>>> United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
>>>> life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
>>>> nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
>>>> protection of the laws.
>>>>
>>>> Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
>>>> liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
>>>
>>> And US laws have no implication in Canada.
>>
>> It would be a better 51st candidate state if they did!
>>
>> You moose-kissers get a free pass for Marie-Pierre Bouchard
>> because she's funny and looks good in a swimsuit.
>>
>
> burn in Hell Yank!
>
>
How's life in your mammy's basement, binky?