From: Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: can.politics,comp.os.linux.advocacy,or.politics,sac.politics,talk.politics.guns,seattle.politics
Subject: Re: Ontario must pay for surgery to give trans resident both penis and vagina: appeal court
Organization: Newshosting.com - Highest quality at a great price! www.newshosting.com
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2025 07:40:37 -0400
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
>>>US laws have no implication in Canada.
>>
>>You're referring to my sig as if it's part of my argument about trans
>>rights in Canada? What gives?
>>
>>--
>>Joel W. Crump
>>
>>Amendment XIV
>>Section 1.
>>
>>[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
>>abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
>>United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
>>life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
>>nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
>>protection of the laws.
>>
>>Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
>>liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
>
>That law has nothing to do with Canadian Politics.
I was talking about something other than my sig, you are ignoring
that. So your response has nothing to do with any post in any group
in this thread.
--
Joel W. Crump
Amendment XIV
Section 1.
[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.
Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.