Subject: Re: Ontario must pay for surgery to give trans resident both penis and vagina: appeal court
Newsgroups: can.politics,comp.os.linux.advocacy,or.politics,sac.politics,talk.politics.guns,seattle.politics
From: Rudy Canoza <rudy.c@kone.net>
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2025 09:51:43 -0400
Organization: theCubeNet - www.thecubenet.com
The Binky Doctor wrote:
> In article <dr5s0kt8p4bi3uldqmho0e0pk2v4a5lvgj@4ax.com>,
> Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> wrote:
>> doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote:
>>
>>>>> US laws have no implication in Canada.
>>>>
>>>> You're referring to my sig as if it's part of my argument about trans
>>>> rights in Canada? What gives?
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Joel W. Crump
>>>>
>>>> Amendment XIV
>>>> Section 1.
>>>>
>>>> [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
>>>> abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
>>>> United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
>>>> life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
>>>> nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
>>>> protection of the laws.
>>>>
>>>> Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
>>>> liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
>>>
>>> That law has nothing to do with Canadian Politics.
>>
>>
>> I was talking about something other than my sig, you are ignoring
>> that. So your response has nothing to do with any post in any group
>> in this thread.
>>
>
> Then why bring up US Law in can.politics?
>
>> --
>> Joel W. Crump
>>
>> Amendment XIV
>> Section 1.
>>
>> [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
>> abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
>> United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
>> life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
>> nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
>> protection of the laws.
>>
>> Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
>> liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
>
>
This is cross posted to six groups, binky, you stupid fuck.