Davin News Server

In article <MPG.427e7f03bcbb5ae198bac3@news.eternal-september.org>,
AlleyCat  <katt@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>Last week, we saw signs of a major market shift, including a rare
>convergence of signals that is pointing to a potential surge in 
>U.S. stocks. Add in a flood of cash just waiting to re-enter the market
>- a key financial event that my InvestorPlace colleague 
>Luke Lango predicts will occur on May 7 - and we could be at the front
>end of a major rally.
>
>Luke believes that a massive bull market surge will occur due to a $7
>trillion wave of cash re-entering the stock market, 
>triggering what he calls a "Summer Panic" like we've not seen since 1997.
>
>That is why he is holding a special 2025 Summer Panic Summit on May 1 at
>7 p.m. Eastern. At this event, Luke will discuss why 
>this one ultra-rare technical indicator flashing last week may be the
>clearest "buy" signal we've seen in years... and why the 
>catalyst on May 7 could change the entire market.
>
>Most importantly, at the event Luke will introduce you to a new set of
>stocks that he believes are primed to lead the next wave 
>of growth.
>
>Click here to reserve your spot. But hurry, you only have one more day
>to save your seat.
>
>Today, Luke is joining us to discuss what he sees coming. Take it away... 
>
>The stock market turned around last week, with the S&P 500 and NASDAQ
>Composite both going up for four straight days. But that's 
>nothing compared to what's next... 
>
>A flood of cash-roughly $7 trillion-is poised to rush back into U.S.
>stocks. One ultra-rare signal says the surge starts now, and 
>a second, even bigger catalyst on May 7 could change the entire market
>and create a summer "panic" like we've not seen since 
>1997.
>
>Look no further than today's market dynamics for proof of the coming storm... 
>
>Trade-war headlines are whipping the market back and forth. Fear of tech
>slowdowns are freezing would-be buyers. Record cash 
>piles are sitting idle while volatility rattles Wall Street. Most
>investors feel trapped, wondering whether the next big move is 
>another crash.
>
>That may sound scary... but what we're seeing are the fingerprints of a
>bottom, not a collapse.
>
>In today's issue, I'll unpack some of those developments... . including
>the fact that my favorite technical indicator triggered 
>on Thursday.
>
>And I'll tell you why those developments could mean we're at the start
>of a big rally.
>
>But I'll also get into the key financial event that's set for May 7...
>and why it could create even bigger market moves than what 
>we've seen so far this year.
>
>I've also identified seven specific ways to position ourselves to profit
>from this Summer Panic - and I'll start laying that out 
>for you now:
>Why the Market Took Off Last Week
>
>First, the fundamentals are turning green.
>
>Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) reported strong quarterly earnings Thursday night.
>Revenues grew steadily in both advertising and cloud - 
>two segments that investors feared would show signs of strain amid the
>trade war drama. But no big slowdown showed up.
>
>Alphabet's results poured cold water on the tech slowdown fears that
>have weighed on markets for weeks.
>
>Meanwhile, more positive signs are emerging on the trade front.
>
>Reports broke on Friday that China is considering exemptions for certain
>U.S. imports from its 125% retaliatory tariff. That 
>comes just days after the U.S. issued its own exemptions from its 145%
>tariff on Chinese goods.
>
>One side softens. Then the other. That's how deals get made.
>
>Stocks rallied. The dollar rallied. Bonds rallied. The "Sell America"
>panic trade is turning into a "Buy America" rally.
>
>The stage is now set for trade deals over the next few months. Plus
>we're seeing strong earnings and stabilizing inflation.
>
>All of this makes the May 7 catalyst I'm expecting even more likely.
>
>For technical traders, the story is just as bullish... 
>Ultra-Rare Indicator Triggered
>
>On Thursday, the Zweig Breadth Thrust bullish signal officially triggered.
>
>A ZBT signal is triggered during very strong price momentum... when the
>stock market moves from an oversold to an overbought 
>situation in 10 or fewer trading days.
>
>The ZBT is an ultra-rare, ultra-bullish indicator that's only flashed 18
>times since World War II. In every single instance, 
>stocks were higher a year later - with average gains of 25%.
>
>That's not noise. That's a signal.
>
>Meanwhile, the S&P 500 just last week notched three straight days of
>gains over 1.5%. That's another rare signal. Since 1950, 
>every time that's happened, stocks have been higher a year later - every
>single time - with average gains of 10%.
>
>You don't see this kind of price action in the middle of a collapse. You
>see it when a collapse is ending.
>
>We think stocks have bottomed - and we're very bullish heading into the summer.
>
>These sorts of catalysts are often the most important thing in investing.
>
>Regional banks and biotechs can trade sideways for years... and then
>surge 100% on a takeover offer. Falling stocks tend to 
>continue downward until a good news catalyst stems the tide.
>
>And now, I've identified a new catalyst that I believe will change the
>entire market.
>Forget the Mag 7... Meet the MAGA 7.
>
>What happens when you mix the most transformational technological
>mega-trend of our lives (AI) with arguably the most ambitious 
>U.S. president we've ever seen (Trump)?
>
>You could ignite a $7 trillion Summer Panic in the markets... the sort
>of surge that we haven't seen since the 1997 internet 
>boom.
>
>That's because investors are sitting on a record $7 trillion in cash,
>waiting for the opportunity to jump in. Private equity 
>alone is sitting on at least $2.62 trillion, according to S&P Global
>Market Intelligence.
>
>That means we could see an enormous return of this cash to the stock
>market this summer.
>
>Because here's the truth: What we've seen in 2025 isn't the stock
>market's first "crash" in recent years.
>
>The 2010 Flash Crash. The 2011 U.S. debt ceiling downgrade. The 2015
>yuan devaluation. The 2018 Fed hike panic. The 2020 Covid 
>crash. The 2022 inflation meltdown.
>
>All of them were buying opportunities for those who knew where to look.
>
>It was during many of the stock market crashes in the last decade that I
>nailed the rise of the Magnificent 7 stocks.
>
>Amid the commodity crisis of the mid-2010s, I picked out Meta Platforms
>Inc. (META), Apple Inc. (AAPL), Amazon.com Inc. (AMZN), 
>and Microsoft Corp. (MSFT) as long-term winners. All four have recorded
>max gains of somewhere between 800% and 1,000% since I 
>picked them.
>
>Then, in February 2018, the stock market found itself in one of its
>fastest 10% corrections ever. On the other side of that 
>plunge, I pinpointed Google as a long-term winner. It has soared nearly
>300% since then.
>
>And in the summer of 2019, the stock market found itself in another
>small sell-off. That's when I pinpointed Tesla Inc. (TSLA) 
>and Nvidia Corp. (NVDA) as great stocks. Since then, Tesla has recorded
>a max gain of more than 3,700%, while Nvidia has shot up 
>as much as 4,000%.
>
>In other words, I called the Magnificent 7 before they were the Mag 7,
>and I did so during periods of elevated market volatility.
>
>I don't say this to brag. Rather, I say this to submit to you a truth
>that people often forget: Volatility creates opportunity.
>
>Every sell-off feels scary in the moment. But in hindsight, it always
>looks like a gift.
>
>This time will be no different.
>
>Beneath the surface of the market chaos, the next great tech rally is forming.
>
>However, it's not forming in the Mag 7 stocks. Those stocks are
>yesterday's trade - not tomorrow's big breakout.
>
>In this next wave, the biggest winners won't be what I'm calling the
>MAGA 7. I'm talking "Make AI Great in America" stocks.
>
>AI is already very good in America. But in the next phase of the AI
>boom, it will become great. We will Make AI Great in America 
>(MAGA) over the next few years.
>
>My MAGA 7 stocks are seven smaller AI companies - several of which
>you've likely never heard of - that are about to ride a wave 
>of federal funding, corporate spending, and re-shoring urgency into the
>spotlight.
>
>They're building the tools. Laying the fiber. Supplying the chips.
>
>Automating the factories. And powering the intelligence behind America's
>next great tech renaissance.
>
>And I'm laying it all out at on Thursday, May 1, at 7 p.m. Eastern
>during my next free broadcast, The Summer Panic Summit (sign 
>up by going here)... 
>
>The May 7 shock... the $7 trillion panic. the seven little-known AI
>stocks that I believe will emerge as massive winners thanks 
>to AI acceleration when the smoke clears.
>
>===============================================================================
>
>"Trump Derangement Syndrome" Is a Real Mental Condition
>
>All you need to know about "Trump Derangement Syndrome, " or TDS.
>
>"Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) is a mental condition in which a
>person has been driven effectively insane due to their dislike 
>of Donald Trump, to the point at which they will abandon all logic and reason."
>
>Justin Raimondo, the editorial director of Antiwar.com, wrote a piece in
>the Los Angeles Times in 2016 that broke TDS down into 
>three distinct phases or stages:
>
>"In the first stage of the disease, victims lose all sense of
>proportion. The president-elect's every tweet provokes a firestorm, 
>as if 140 characters were all it took to change the world."
>
>"The mid-level stages of TDS have a profound effect on the victim's
>vocabulary: Sufferers speak a distinctive language consisting 
>solely of hyperbole."
>
>"As TDS progresses, the afflicted lose the ability to distinguish
>fantasy from reality."
>
>The Point here is simple: TDS is, in the eyes of its adherents, the
>knee-jerk opposition from liberals to anything and everything 
>Trump does. If Trump announced he was donating every dollar he's ever
>made, TDS sufferers would suggest he was up to something 
>nefarious, according to the logic of TDS. There's nothing - not. one.
>thing. - that Trump could do or say that would be received 
>positively by TDSers.
>
>The history of Trump Derangement Syndrome actually goes back to the
>early 2000s - a time when the idea of Trump as president was 
>a punch line for late-night comics and nothing more.
>
>Wikipedia traces its roots to "Bush Derangement Syndrome" - a term first
>coined by the late conservative columnist Charles 
>Krauthammer back in 2003. The condition, as Krauthammer defined it, was
>"the acute onset of paranoia in otherwise normal people 
>in reaction to the policies, the presidency - nay - the very existence
>of George W. Bush."
>
>Added Krauthammer:
>
>"Some clinicians consider this delusion - that Americans can only get
>their news from one part of the political spectrum - the 
>gravest of all. They report that no matter how many times sufferers in
>padded cells are presented with flash cards with the 
>symbols ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC, NPR, PBS, Time, Newsweek, New York
>Times, Washington Post, L.A. Times - they remain 
>unresponsive, some in a terrifying near-catatonic torpor."
>
>(If you don't realize the idea of TDS or BDS is - in no small part -
>meant in a tongue-in-cheek manner then, well, you may well 
>have it.)
>
>Trump allies believe that TDS is worse than ODS or BDS - by a lot. Wrote
>conservative pundit Bernie Goldberg on Real Clear 
>Politics in early 2017:
>
>"Before the election, the victims of TDS routinely compared Donald Trump
>to Hitler. Guess what. They're still doing it. Articles 
>in respectable publications written by professors at elite universities
>are warning us to be on guard, that a Trump presidency 
>could imperil democracy-as-we-know-it and may very well spell doom for
>American civilization.
>
>"On election night, as it became obvious that their worst nightmare was
>about to come true, some libs fainted. Some vomited. Many 
>more threatened to leave the country, but I'm pretty sure none actually
>did. As Donald Trump might say in a tweet: so sad!"
>
>The truth is that TDS is just the preferred nomenclature of Trump
>defenders who view those who oppose him and his policies as 
>nothing more than the blind hatred of those who preach tolerance and
>free speech. Viewed more broadly, the rise of presidential 
>derangement syndromes is a function of increased polarization - not to
>mention our national self-sorting - at work in the country 
>today.
>
>We no longer live around, work around or pal around with people who
>think any differently than us. We watch cable news that 
>affirms what we already think. We read ideological "news" sites that
>tell us how good our side is and how bad the other one is. 
>And on and on and on.
>
>Is it any wonder then that we are increasingly willing to lump those who
>disagree with us into the 'deranged" category? To say 
>that those who don't share our views are mentally deficient in some way?
>
>What does it say about a President - and about a country - when the
>standard response to those with whom you disagree is that 
>they must be crazy? Nothing good, for sure. 
>
>=====
>
>Many clinicians, political commentators, and members of the public have
>speculated upon the mental health of President Donald 
>Trump. Indeed, over 70,000 people self-identifying as 'mental health
>professionals" have signed a petition declaring that "Trump 
>is mentally ill and must be removed." In sociological terms, the
>'medical gaze" has been hitherto focused on President Trump, and 
>to a lesser extent his ardent supporters.
>
>However, in recent months, many have been questioning the direction of
>this 'medical gaze." In fact, more and more people are 
>suggesting that this 'medical gaze" should be reversed and refocused on
>President Trump's most embittered and partisan opponents. 
>Some have even suggested that these opponents are experiencing a
>specific mental condition-a condition which has been labelled 
>"Trump Derangement Syndrome" (TDS).
>What does DSM-5 say about "Trump Derangement Syndrome"?
>
>Mental illnesses are officially classified in a dense and dry book
>published by the American Psychiatric Association (APA) known 
>as the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth
>Edition (DSM-5). This book contains 947 pages and lists 
>hundreds of mental disorders; TDS is nowhere to be seen. Similarly, a
>review of scholarly databases such as MEDLINE and Google 
>Scholar reveal no academic papers on this alleged syndrome. Officially
>at least, TDS is not a real, diagnosable, or treatable 
>mental disorder.
>
>That said, medical anthropologists and critical sociologists have
>convincingly argued that DSM-5 is a flawed document. Indeed, 
>social scientists have long recognized that there are numerous "folk
>categories" of mental disorders that are considered real 
>conditions by the general public, even though they are not recognized as
>such in the DSM. These include categories such as 
>"burnout" or "nervous breakdown."
>
>As such, lack of official recognition does not mean that TDS is not a
>real mental condition.
>
>
>Lay Understandings of "Trump Derangement Syndrome"
>
>There is no shared lay understanding of TDS, mainly because it is a folk
>category rather than a professional category. As such, 
>there is currently much armchair speculation about the nature and
>existence of TDS, without consensus.
>
>The name itself explicitly suggests a "syndrome, " which the Oxford
>English Dictionary defines as "a characteristic combination 
>of 
>opinions, emotions, or behavior." Several commentators have run with
>this, putting forth suggestions about opinions, emotions and 
>behaviors characterizing TDS.
>
>Shared amongst these is a notion that the everyday activities of
>President Trump trigger some people into distorted opinions, 
>extreme emotions and hysterical behaviors. Well-known writer Bernard
>Goldberg gives supposed behavioral examples of TDS among 
>Trump's political opponents, including fainting, vomiting, students
>retreating to "safe spaces" and others demanding "therapy 
>dogs." Political commentator Justin Raimondo focuses on opinions,
>language and cognition, writing in the LA Times that "sufferers 
>speak a distinctive language consisting of hyperbole [leading to] a
>constant state of hysteria... the afflicted lose touch with 
>reality."
>
>Such forms of highly emotional reaction could be something akin to the
>fainting and screaming characterizing American Beatlemania 
>in the 1960s. Unlike the Beatles, however, the extreme emotional
>reaction alleged to characterize TDS is not based on adoration 
>and admiration, but on fear and loathing.
>
>Contrariwise, many others ridicule the notion that TDS is anything but a
>malicious slur term used to discredit and delegitimize 
>criticism of President Trump. For example, CNN's Chris Cillizza may
>speak for many when he stated: "The truth is that TDS is just 
>the preferred nomenclature of Trump defenders who view those who oppose
>him and his policies as nothing more than blind hatred." 
>Likewise, Adam Gopnik writes that "our problem is not TDS; our problem
>is Deranged Trump Self-Delusion."
>
>In other words, there are polarized opinions about the nature, reality
>and existence of TDS.
>
>
>Conclusion
>
>The wider public may be unaware that psychiatrists and social scientists
>spend considerable time and energy behind closed doors 
>pondering over the existence and reality of mental conditions. This has
>led the APA to revise the DSM five times since 1952, 
>considerably expanding the list of official mental disorders with each
>revision. As far as I am aware, few psychiatrists are 
>currently arguing that DSM-6 should contain TDS as a mental disorder.
>
>That said, in its official definition of mental disorder, the DSM-5
>states that "a mental disorder is a syndrome characterized by 
>clinically significant disturbance in an individual's cognition, emotion
>regulation, or behavior... mental disorders are usually 
>associated with significant distress in social, occupational, or other
>important activities."
>
>Many have argued that some people have been seriously disturbed and
>distressed by the policies, speech, behavior, and tweets of 
>President Trump, so much so that it has affected their cognitive,
>affective, and behavioral functioning. Such people may need 
>mental health support. As such, further research is necessary to
>investigate the extreme reactions toward President Trump, in the 
>same way that researchers investigate other extreme social phenomena,
>such as Beatlemania or the like. This will shed light on 
>the reality of this emerging folk category that has been labelled by
>many as "Trump Derangement Syndrome." 
>

What does this have to do with can.politics ?

-- 
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
Australia -Save the Nation from Donald Trump - Vote out Albanese!