From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,can.politics,alt.politics.trump,alt.politics.liberalism,alt.politics.democrats,alt.politics.usa.republican
Subject: Re: Egg Prices Soaring
Date: Sat, 3 May 2025 14:05:18 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
On 2025-05-03 06:08, NoBody wrote:
> On Fri, 2 May 2025 13:01:34 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>
>> On 2025-05-02 03:53, NoBody wrote:
>>> On Thu, 1 May 2025 07:57:09 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2025-05-01 03:57, NoBody wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 30 Apr 2025 08:56:20 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2025-04-30 04:05, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>> On Tue, 29 Apr 2025 08:44:38 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 2025-04-29 03:58, NoBody wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 21:23:26 -0500, AlleyCat <katt@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 06:41:06 -0400, Governor Swill says...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Florida a dozen large eggs will set you back $4.5.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> $3.94 here.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://i.imgur.com/Frg9Q5y.jpg
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Neither of those numbers are anywhere near the original claim which
>>>>>>>>> was yet another media lie.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So what WAS the original claim?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That the average price of eggs was over $6 and climbing. Cause NPR
>>>>>>> said so...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Laughter.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Now I've checked and that was said back in January, and egg prices WERE
>>>>>> that high.
>>>>>
>>>>> I think you'd better check again. The post was made about two weeks
>>>>> ago. Google Groups going away has made citing previous posts a lot
>>>>> more difficult.
>>>>
>>>> This thread was started on January 30, 2025 at 13:10PST, so the
>>>> "original claim" OF this thread was made then:
>>>>
>>>> <vnfu90$p98$1@panix3.panix.com>
>>>
>>>
>>> Your link goes nowhere. However Bradley bot posted the claim in about
>>> the last two weeks. If you're able to determine the start of the
>>> thread, you should be able to find that message as well.
>>
>> It's not a "link", doofus. It's a MESSAGE-ID.
>>
>> You claim someone "posted the claim in about the last two weeks"?
>>
>> You show it.
>>
>
> Damn you're lazy:
Damn, you're stupid.
>
>
> From: bks@panix.com (Bradley K. Sherman)
> Newsgroups: talk.politics.misc,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics
> Subject: Re: Egg Prices Soaring
> Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 21:27:08 -0000 (UTC)
> Organization: RNA + Sunlight
> Message-ID: <vt9d3c$n1o$1@reader1.panix.com>
> References: <vnfu90$p98$1@panix3.panix.com>
> <vr7fvc$esb$1@reader1.panix.com> <vrp0o8$fal$2@reader1.panix.com>
> <l7f2ujlabuvc6kptc0rjb38cmaes0lvhuk@4ax.com>
> Reply-To: bks@panix.com
> Injection-Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2025 21:27:08 -0000 (UTC)
> Injection-Info: reader1.panix.com;
> posting-host="panix3.panix.com:166.84.1.3";
> logging-data="23608"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@panix.com"
> X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
> Xref: news.eternal-september.org talk.politics.misc:1326307
> alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:3166621 alt.politics:2272491
> X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 250411-2, 4/11/2025), Inbound message
> X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> | Egg-flation
>
> |
> | Egg prices at supermarkets hit a record high in March
> | despite fewer bird flu outbreaks and falling wholesale
> | costs -- indicating retailers could be holding out on
> | passing along the lower prices.
> |
> | The average consumer price for a dozen eggs reached $6.23
> | in March, a 5.9% jump from the month before - and a
> | whopping 60.4% climb over the past year, the Bureau of
> | Labor Statistics said on Thursday.
> | ...
> <https://nypost.com/2025/04/10/business/egg-prices-hit-record-high-in-march-despite-fewer-bird-flu-outbreaks-lower-wholesale-costs/>
>
> --bks
>
> Now you're going to whine that it's not exactly two weeks ago...
"That the average price of eggs was over $6 and climbing. Cause NPR
said so..."
So:
1. Not NPR
2. A right-wing source stating the price really was over $6 in MARCH.
>
>>>
>>> Lastly, since these threads are hacked up with editing, you made a
>>> presumption that the thread start was what I was referring to. In any
>>> case, who cares???
>>
>> Here you are trying to argue, so I'm saying YOU care.
>>
>
> Laughter.
>
>> You got it wrong, doofus. Behave like an adult and just admit it.
>
>
> See above.
Indeed.