Davin News Server

In article <XnsB2D710160F02BX@135.181.20.170>,
useapen  <yourdime@outlook.com> wrote:
>“What Canada was, is not as important as what Canada is, and what it is 
>becoming.” —Jason Stephan
>
>As a result of the Liberal victory and the installation of Mark Carney as 
>prime minister of Canada in the April 28, 2025, election, the country is 
>now speeding down the Trans-Canada highway to certain destruction. Carney, 
>of course, is a global financier, a promoter of centralized government 
>control, a lover of censorship, and a climate change apostle who doubles 
>as a trustee of the World Economic Forum and the United Nations Special 
>Envoy on Climate Change and Finance. He carries three passports, Canadian, 
>Irish, and British, and has spent the last decade out of Canada, which 
>obviously makes him the ideal candidate for the prime ministership, 
>Canadian to the bone. 
>
>He is, in fact, the spitting image of the Canadian psyche, a small man, 
>slack-faced, awkward in comportment, grim and humorless, rag doll-like in 
>his person. The fit is almost providential. As one commenter put it, 
>“Carney looks the part… the funeral director of Canada.”
>
>The question that is making the rounds is how the Liberal Party managed to 
>erase a 20-point deficit in the polls and shrug off three terms of social 
>and economic devastation that have seen the country plummet toward third-
>world status while at the same time elevating the most unprepossessing 
>choice possible to the prime minister’s office. Is the nation brain-dead? 
>Does it have a death wish? Is it merely greed for government largesse? 
>What are the factors that have contributed to Canada’s accelerating 
>decline? There are several possibilities, acting singly or in concert. 
>
>Donald Trump: When Trump began trolling Canada with his 51st state 
>bagatelle, he proved once again that Canadians have no sense of humor. 
>Canadians, by and large, with thank-the-Lord saving exceptions, are an 
>earnest, priggish, self-massaging, unexciting people of limited 
>intelligence who, like most of a leftist bent, cannot recognize a joke, 
>especially when brandished by an American. What former New York Post 
>correspondent Emma Jo-Morris says of the media seems largely true of the 
>Canadian electorate: “The media isn’t biased because it’s liberal; it’s 
>biased because it has no concept of reality. The people who make media 
>content are incapable of separating their own self-worship from objective 
>truth.” Of course, being Liberal and having no concept of reality amount 
>to the same thing.
>
>So Canadians took Trump seriously and got their hackles up, huffing and 
>puffing and strutting and posturing. But when Trump launched his tariff 
>fusillade, this was a bridge too far. Canadians girded themselves for war 
>like a mighty gnat prepared to crush an elephant rather than adopt the 
>grown-up approach of Alberta Premier Danielle Smith, who visited Trump and 
>proposed a negotiated settlement. This was Mark Carney’s and the Liberals' 
>gold-plated opportunity to rally a subfusc Canadian electorate to a losing 
>cause and scrub the Conservatives’ favorable poll numbers, leading 
>ultimately to an electoral victory that will likely destroy the country. 
>Indeed, Canada is more ragged than it ever was. What was once a Hudson Bay 
>blanket is now a patchwork quilt.
>
>The New Democratic Party: After years of propping up the Liberals, leader 
>Jagmeet Singh and the NDP came crashing down. The Party lost not only its 
>longtime leader but also its official party status. Its 25 parliamentary 
>seats were reduced to seven. It is likely that many of the lost 18 seats 
>defected to Carney’s Liberals, putting them over the top, good enough for 
>a minority government, just three seats short of a majority. There is 
>speculation that some or all of the remaining NDP rump may follow suit, 
>giving the Liberals the majority government they desperately crave.
>
>Biased Coverage: The Canadian media and paper press are basically no 
>different from their Pravda-like American cousins, trafficking in lies, 
>innuendoes, suppressions, and outright interference in the electoral 
>process. This is their stock-in-trade. With only a few outliers like Rebel 
>News, the Western Standard, and two or three others, the press has become 
>a vast and undifferentiated propaganda network for the Liberal machine, 
>flush with Liberal plugola. Canada’s public broadcaster, the CBC, is 
>supported by an annual $1.4 billion grant, which Carney has promised to 
>inflate and Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre had threatened to 
>eliminate. The sequel was predictable.
>
>The Patronage Network: Julius Ruechel observes that “districts that either 
>benefit from govt handouts or benefit from high levels of govt employment 
>all tend to vote for left-leaning parties. In Canada, 1 in 4 employed 
>Canadians works for govt [and] on top of that the countless legal cartels 
>and govt contracts and welfare programs of all sorts, which adds up to a 
>very large and reliable leftist voting coalition. Voter incentives favor 
>the preservation of the status quo.” A socialist government robbing the 
>national ATM is generally assured of a stipendiary public.   
>
>Canada’s Equalization Program: Entrenched in the 1982 Canadian 
>Constitution, it is a federal transfer payment system designed to reduce 
>disparities in fiscal capacity among the provinces by transferring 
>revenues from richer provinces to their poorer counterparts. This system 
>represents the apotheosis of voter incentive. It is really a form of river 
>hockey in which the teams that give less defeat the teams that have 
>contributed more to the game. Canadians in the have-not provinces — which 
>are pretty much all of them these days, with the exception of the three 
>western provinces, Alberta, Saskatchewan and British Columbia — suspected 
>that the Conservatives would reduce the transfer payments that keep the 
>country’s parasitical regions afloat, though Poilievre indicated he would 
>let wallowing porkers lie. The Liberals under Trudeau and now Carney were 
>a better bet to keep the pogey flowing in order to retain provincial 
>loyalty and ensure the sycophants stay happy. 
>
>Pierre Poilievre: Some claim that Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre is 
>generally unlikeable, with an unpronounceable surname, a face made for 
>radio, and a voice for silent films. These blemishes have apparently 
>reduced his popularity, though he did enjoy a 20-point lead in the polls 
>until Trump’s tariffs empowered the patriotic rodomontade of Carney and 
>his voters’ tumescent self-regard and media-manufactured, anti-American 
>zealotry.
>
>More to the point, Canadian jurisdictions on the national dole were not 
>comfortable with Poilievre’s Trump-like policies of fiscal restraint and 
>debt paydown. It was more important to keep the milk and honey flowing, 
>even though the cow was sickly and the bees were growing extinct. A 
>majority of Canadians were content to kick the Canada down the road.  
>
>Poilievre has his deficiencies, but he was clearly the far superior 
>candidate.
>
>Communication: The Liberals are far more adept at communicating feelings 
>rather than facts, as the Conservatives tend to do. This puts the latter 
>at a serious disadvantage. Liberals ply a rhetoric of theatrical sentiment 
>focusing on external threats and domestic doughtiness, which appeals to a 
>largely insecure and unsophisticated people. Conservatives, on the whole, 
>address real issues, facts on the ground, and bottom-line evidence, which 
>few like to hear. Conservatives are also far more preoccupied with 
>Canadian history and its significant figures, whether philosopher George 
>Grant or founding father Sir John A. Macdonald. This is the kiss of 
>political death.
>
>The Generation Gap: It has often been noted that Liberals attract an older 
>and more settled generation, well-off retirees, boomers who profited from 
>more affluent times, and own their mortgage-free homes. This is also true 
>of economic failures who rely on a welfare society to provide them with a 
>modest lifestyle. The country’s youth, however, have been abandoned. “Gen 
>Z and Millennial men who know this country is rigged against them,” writes 
>David Parker, “are fleeing Canada, because it is simply unaffordable for 
>anyone living on a normal income.” They gave the Conservatives a higher 
>share of the vote compared to past performance, but not enough to offset 
>Liberal gains. 
>
>Whatever the reasons for the Liberal victory and the consequent and 
>imminent collapse of a nation, Canada is now enmeshed in the fifth act of 
>its political and economic tragedy. According to a news release by Fitch 
>Ratings, one of the "Big Three" credit rating agencies, alongside Moody's 
>and Standard & Poor's, Canada is in deep doodoo. Just one day after Carney 
>was elected, the agency warned that Carney’s economic policies point to 
>“considerable fiscal loosening that would exacerbate already expanding 
>fiscal deficits.” 
>
>Canada is finished. It will go on for a time relying on inertia, not 
>momentum, but it is demonstrably running down. Game, Set, and Match.
>
>https://pjmedia.com/david-solway-2/2025/05/05/canada-a-post-election-
>autopsy-n4939494

Looks like the right wing wants a north American war to break out1
-- 
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
Australia -Save the Nation from Donald Trump - Vote out Albanese!