Davin News Server

On Wed, 7 May 2025 09:16:09 -0700,  Alan says...  

> 
> On 2025-05-06 22:29, AlleyCat wrote:
> > 
> > On Tue, 6 May 2025 19:23:45 -0700,  Alan says...
> > 
> >>
> >> On 2025-05-06 18:32, AlleyCat wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, 6 May 2025 16:34:15 -0400,  Chris Ahlstrom says...
> >>>
> >>>>> The Oklahoma Republican Party has added several new priorities to its party
> >>>>> platform, including opposing funding increases for public schools, banning 5G
> >>>>> technology and eliminating mail-in and early voting.
> >>>>
> >>>> Banning 5G? Wtf?
> >>>
> >>> Figgers.
> >>>
> >>> The faggots always jerk each others' knees and what lies between, when they don't read the articles... only looking at the
> >>> headline and nodding their heads before they even know the details and facts.
> > 
> >> What "articles"?
> >>
> >> You never provide links to them.
> > 
> > LOL... funny.

> If you define "funny" as "accurate".

Mmmm... nope.

So... you're going to make an issue out of idiots not reading articles? I noticed you didn't address what I said, e.g., "It 
affects sleep. It affects rhythms in your body. There is studies where it can be the cause of some cancers."

I guess you did a little research, like I did, and found what I wrote to be plausible, hence, there are no stupid questions as a 
retort.

Did you have a chance to read my posts to Chris Ahlstrom about the studies going on, meaning NOTHING has been "debunked"? Either 
way, you chose to harp on "when they don't read the articles", instead of the topic.

You lose, again.

I get it... you didn't reply to him, when he said all that 5G shit was "debunked", because you researched it like I did, and 
found it NOT "debunked".

So, I guess this is why you replied to me and not to him, and picked out THE most mundane minutiae/non-issue in what I wrote.

The topic isn't what you libertards read or don't read. 

You are so fucking stupid.

I guess I need to put this in terms even YOU'D understand.

"... when they don't read the articles..." is a GENERAL statement about someone not reading articles.

HERE is the articles they obviously didn't read.

=====

Oklahoma GOP Adds New Policy Priorities To Platform
May 6,2025

The Oklahoma Republican Party has added 
several new priorities to its party 
platform, including opposing funding 
increases for public schools, banning 
5G technology and eliminating mail-in 
and early voting.

Oklahoma Republicans hold every 
statewide elected office and a 
supermajority in the Legislature, 
giving them more leverage to pass 
their policy priorities through the 
legislature without as much need to 
makes comprises with democrats.

https://www.nwahomepage.com/news/oklahoma-gop-adds-new-policy-priorities-to-platform/

=====

And this is what they missed by not reading it all, only reading what Lee posted:

"It affects sleep. It affects rhythms in your body. There is studies where it can be the cause of some cancers."

And this is what they believed, because they just read it, without researching.

Those claims, widely spread by conspiracy theorists during the COVID-19 pandemic, have been REPEATEDLY DEBUNKED by scientists 
around the world, including those with the National Institute of Health, whose studies found "no confirmed evidence" that 5G 
frequencies are "hazardous to human health."

WHAT "scientists" and where are their studies?

They couldn't POSSIBLY have TRULY "debunked" what 5G does or doesn't do, because there COULDN'T have been ANY long/longer term 
studies. 5G is too new.

=====

If the claims have been "debunked", then why did The NIH do THIS?

I also noticed that, along with Chris Ahlstrom, YOU didn't bother to reply/refute/debunk this:

Evidence For A Connection Between Corona virus Disease-19 And Exposure To Radiofrequency Radiation From Wireless Communications 
INCLUDING 5G - NIH.gov

Abstract

Background and Aim:

Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) public health policy has focused on the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-
2) virus and its effects on human health while environmental factors have been largely ignored. In considering the 
epidemiological triad (agent-host-environment) applicable to all disease, we investigated a possible environmental factor in the 
COVID-19 pandemic: ambient radiofrequency radiation from wireless communication systems including microwaves and millimeter 
waves. SARS-CoV-2, the virus that caused the COVID-19 pandemic, surfaced in Wuhan, China shortly after the implementation of 
city-wide (fifth generation [5G] of wireless communications radiation [WCR]), and rapidly spread globally, initially 
demonstrating a statistical correlation to international communities with recently established 5G networks. In this study, we 
examined the peer-reviewed scientific literature on the detrimental bioeffects of WCR and identified several mechanisms by which 
WCR may have contributed to the COVID-19 pandemic as a toxic environmental cofactor. By crossing boundaries between the 
disciplines of biophysics and pathophysiology, we present evidence that WCR may: (1) cause morphologic changes in erythrocytes 
including echinocyte and rouleaux formation that can contribute to hypercoagulation; (2) impair microcirculation and reduce 
erythrocyte and hemoglobin levels exacerbating hypoxia; (3) amplify immune system dysfunction, including immunosuppression, 
autoimmunity, and hyperinflammation; (4) increase cellular oxidative stress and the production of free radicals resulting in 
vascular injury and organ damage; (5) increase intracellular Ca2+ essential for viral entry, replication, and release, in 
addition to promoting pro-inflammatory pathways; and (6) worsen heart arrhythmias and cardiac disorders.

[... ]

Conclusion

There is a SUBSTANTIAL OVERLAP IN PATHOBIOLOGY BETWEEN COVID-19 AND WCR EXPOSURE. THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED here indicates that 
mechanisms involved in THE CLINICAL PROGRESSION OF COVID-19 COULD ALSO BE GENERATED, according to experimental data, BY WCR 
EXPOSURE. Therefore, we propose A LINK BETWEEN ADVERSE BIOEFFECTS OF WCR EXPOSURE FROM WIRELESS DEVICES AND COVID-19.

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8580522/

The website pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov refers to PubMed Central (PMC), which is a free digital repository that archives publicly 
accessible full-text scholarly articles in the biomedical and life sciences. It is maintained by the National Institutes of 
Health (NIH) and provides access to a vast collection of research papers, reviews, and other scientific literature. Researchers, 
healthcare professionals, and the general public can use PMC to find and read articles related to various topics in medicine and 
biology.

===============================================================================

"Trump Derangement Syndrome" Is a Real Mental Condition

All you need to know about "Trump Derangement Syndrome," or TDS.

"Trump Derangement Syndrome (TDS) is a mental condition in which a person has been driven effectively insane due to their dislike 
of Donald Trump, to the point at which they will abandon all logic and reason."

Justin Raimondo, the editorial director of Antiwar.com, wrote a piece in the Los Angeles Times in 2016 that broke TDS down into 
three distinct phases or stages:

"In the first stage of the disease, victims lose all sense of proportion. The president-elect's every tweet provokes a firestorm, 
as if 140 characters were all it took to change the world."

"The mid-level stages of TDS have a profound effect on the victim's vocabulary: Sufferers speak a distinctive language consisting 
solely of hyperbole."

"As TDS progresses, the afflicted lose the ability to distinguish fantasy from reality."

The Point here is simple: TDS is, in the eyes of its adherents, the knee-jerk opposition from liberals to anything and everything 
Trump does. If Trump announced he was donating every dollar he's ever made, TDS sufferers would suggest he was up to something 
nefarious, according to the logic of TDS. There's nothing - not. one. thing. - that Trump could do or say that would be received 
positively by TDSers.

The history of Trump Derangement Syndrome actually goes back to the early 2000s - a time when the idea of Trump as president was 
a punch line for late-night comics and nothing more.

Wikipedia traces its roots to "Bush Derangement Syndrome" - a term first coined by the late conservative columnist Charles 
Krauthammer back in 2003. The condition, as Krauthammer defined it, was "the acute onset of paranoia in otherwise normal people 
in reaction to the policies, the presidency - nay - the very existence of George W. Bush."